Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:56:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335861: module-init-tools initscript should be started 
befor udev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2005 10:44:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 03:44:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postman1.arcor-online.net (postman.arcor.de) [151.189.20.156] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EUilV-0003fQ-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 03:44:18 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain (dslc-213-023-154-023.pools.arcor-ip.net 
[213.23.154.23])
        (authenticated bits=0)
        by postman.arcor.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9QAiFVV023638
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
        Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:44:15 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from scorpion by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.54)
        id 1EUgfx-0007FR-L6; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:30:25 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tino Keitel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: module-init-tools initscript should be started befor udev
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:30:25 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: module-init-tools
Version: 3.2-pre9-3
Severity: normal

Hi,

in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/10/msg00380.html, you
mentioned a change of the run priority of the module-init-tools
initscript to S03 to be able to specify an order for modules which
should be loaded at boot time. However, it looks like this didn't
happen with the last upload. Maybe it should be included in the next
upload.

Regards,
Tino


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc5
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages module-init-tools depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.3.5-7    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  lsb-base                      3.0-10     Linux Standard Base 3.0 init scrip

module-init-tools recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 335861-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2005 10:56:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 03:56:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EUixg-00069o-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 03:56:52 -0700
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id 567CA5F908; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:56:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001)
        id CC2551CCAF; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:56:44 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:56:44 +0200
To: Tino Keitel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#335861: module-init-tools initscript should be started befor 
udev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AqsLC8rIMeq19msA"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Oct 26, Tino Keitel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/10/msg00380.html, you
> mentioned a change of the run priority of the module-init-tools
> initscript to S03 to be able to specify an order for modules which
> should be loaded at boot time. However, it looks like this didn't
> happen with the last upload. Maybe it should be included in the next
> upload.
It will never happen, because the script expects / to be writeable.

--=20
ciao,
Marco

--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDX2DsFGfw2OHuP7ERAr1rAJ9zSAUDhq9iMzS6EqjDBQQTgwnzGQCfQfmu
yfwQpExh5ujTzIBVU+CWIP8=
=Oaxy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to