Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:47:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321356: fixed in gnubiff 2.1.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Aug 2005 00:48:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 04 17:48:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (arafune2.sendai.riken.go.jp) [134.160.214.108] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E0qNk-0001eu-00; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 17:48:16 -0700
Received: from arafune by arafune2.sendai.riken.go.jp with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1E0qNF-0004Jp-6P; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 09:47:45 +0900
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ryuichi Arafune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: please consider using FAM not libgamin0
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 09:47:45 +0900
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gnubiff
Version: 2.1.4-2
Severity: minor

>From the version 2.1.4-2, gnubiff requires libgamin0 instead of
libfam0c102.  Although gamin is useful for the most cases, it does not
support NFS support based on specific RPC and server.  

Because my home directory is NFS mounted, i prefer FAM rather than
gamin.  Could you consider to use FAM again ?

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 321356-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2005 22:47:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 28 15:47:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EVd07-0007tq-00; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:47:07 -0700
From: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#321356: fixed in gnubiff 2.1.6-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:47:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: gnubiff
Source-Version: 2.1.6-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnubiff, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gnubiff_2.1.6-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnubiff/gnubiff_2.1.6-1.diff.gz
gnubiff_2.1.6-1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gnubiff/gnubiff_2.1.6-1.dsc
gnubiff_2.1.6-1_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/g/gnubiff/gnubiff_2.1.6-1_sparc.deb
gnubiff_2.1.6.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/gnubiff/gnubiff_2.1.6.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gnubiff package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:59:26 +0200
Source: gnubiff
Binary: gnubiff
Architecture: source sparc
Version: 2.1.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 gnubiff    - A mail notification program for GNOME (and others)
Closes: 321356 335193 335820
Changes: 
 gnubiff (2.1.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
   * C++ ABI transition ready as far as FAM is concerned (libfam0 back again
     instead of gamin, Closes: #321356).
   * Added reference to info page in manpage (Closes: #335193)
   * Removed references to "--gtk" (Closes: #335820)
Files: 
 4a66c4fbb555497caa8e0345b74a51a9 710 mail optional gnubiff_2.1.6-1.dsc
 e284c22bdc3f4d263cd874fddbcfb950 757341 mail optional gnubiff_2.1.6.orig.tar.gz
 eebeda4d51e9a85548bb985292dbe24a 4699 mail optional gnubiff_2.1.6-1.diff.gz
 0fa07d0a10488a533a367017f2d4607e 431598 mail optional gnubiff_2.1.6-1_sparc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDYpmlcaH/YBv43g8RAiVpAKDN2UeU9ovNzvJgJX+8Wrhejg5EaQCeNhpf
qRLvl3INjGjFWvyeIaQCHCc=
=wYnL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to