Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2013 11:49:01 -0500
with message-id
<CADpKWq7EmcZTQBx=3TQyE3=gJOzxJajf0rB7QNUT=pc98tf...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Closing #629232
has caused the Debian Bug report #629232,
regarding dict-jargon: Missing "modern" social-networking jargon. "derp"?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
629232: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629232
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dict-jargon
Version: 4.4.4-7
Severity: wishlist
Hi. Sorry it's been orphaned; some of us out here do appreciate it
exists.
I would like it to keep up with the times, and it should be fairly
simple to automate the process. reportbug may be a bit too
heavyweight an interface for the typical user, so how about
"www.debian.org/dict-submit-suggest".
Two boxes on the page, one for the "word", and another for the
submitter's definition.
WTF does "derp" mean?!? Grrr. Have fun. I'll go find jargonpedia.org
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.8
APT prefers oldstable
APT policy: (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages dict-jargon depends on:
ii dictd [dict-server] 1.10.11.dfsg-2 Dictionary Server
dict-jargon recommends no packages.
dict-jargon suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) Please don't Cc: me.
- -
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi, I'm closing this bug now.
Debian does not edit the Jargon FIle. Please see:
http://www.catb.org/jargon/submissions.html
In particular, please note: "An entry may be outside the File's scope
if it's established technical jargon that you'd find in a computer
science or engineering textbook. Or if it's mainstream slang used by
hackers but not unique to hackers."
Regards,
Ruben
--- End Message ---
