Your message dated Thu, 23 May 2013 20:56:47 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#709517: RM: vcsh -- remove vcsh 1.2-3~bpo60+2 from
squeeze-backports
has caused the Debian Bug report #709517,
regarding RM: vcsh -- remove vcsh 1.2-3~bpo60+2 from squeeze-backports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
709517: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709517
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: [email protected]
Usertag: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Please remove vcsh 1.2-3~bpo60+2 from squeeze-backports.
My sponsor, CC'ed, uploaded to squeeze-backports instead of
squeeze-backports-sloppy by mistake.
Once this is done, we will re-upload a version that will allow clean
upgrades from squeeze-backports to wheezy.
Thank you for your help and sorry for the extra effort,
Richard
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On 05/23/2013 20:23, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> Please remove vcsh 1.2-3~bpo60+2 from squeeze-backports.
>
> My sponsor, CC'ed, uploaded to squeeze-backports instead of
> squeeze-backports-sloppy by mistake.
>
> Once this is done, we will re-upload a version that will allow clean
> upgrades from squeeze-backports to wheezy.
The -backports suites are handled by the backports team (CC'ed),
including removals.
Ansgar
--- End Message ---
