Your message dated Sat, 25 May 2013 17:53:10 +0300 (EEST)
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Closing old bugs filed against tomcat5.5 (or related packages)
has caused the Debian Bug report #536328,
regarding tomcat5.5: permission rights changed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
536328: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536328
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tomcat5.5
Version: 5.5.26-5
Severity: important


We use tomcat out eclipse with the sysdeo plugin. This doesn't use the
/etc/init.d 
script and since eclipse is neither run as root nor user "tomcat55" some
changes 
on the permission-rights were necessary.

When upgrading from etch to lenny, but also when upgrading the tomcat
version as they get released by debian.
all those settings are overwritten (due to the sym-linking, quite some
directories stay the same).

One improvement opportunity is certainly on the tomcat side as per 
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495, but when upgrading
with apt-get, debian also
should offer to preserve the rights given or suggest an alternate approach
how to run tomcat in eclipse
on a developer workstation!

-- System Informations:
Debian Release: 5.0.2
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages tomcat5.5 depends on:
ii  adduser              3.110               add and remove users and groups
ii  gij [java2-runtime-h 4:4.3.2-2           The GNU Java bytecode
interpreter
ii  gij-4.1 [java2-runti 4.1.1-20            The GNU Java bytecode
interpreter
ii  gij-4.3 [java2-runti 4.3.2-2             The GNU Java bytecode
interpreter
ii  java-gcj-compat [jav 1.0.78-2            Java runtime environment using
GIJ
ii  java-gcj-compat-head 1.0.78-2            Java runtime environment using
GIJ
ii  jsvc                 1.0.2~svn20061127-9 wrapper to launch Java
application
ii  libecj-java          3.3.0+0728-9        Eclipse Java compiler (library)
ii  libtomcat5.5-java    5.5.26-5            Java Servlet engine -- core
librar
ii  sun-java5-jre [java2 1.5.0-17-0.1        Sun Java(TM) Runtime
Environment (

tomcat5.5 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages tomcat5.5 suggests:
ii  gij [java-virtual-machine]  4:4.3.2-2    The GNU Java bytecode
interpreter
ii  gij-4.1 [java-virtual-machi 4.1.1-20     The GNU Java bytecode
interpreter
ii  gij-4.3 [java-virtual-machi 4.3.2-2      The GNU Java bytecode
interpreter
ii  java-gcj-compat [java-virtu 1.0.78-2     Java runtime environment using
GIJ
ii  java-gcj-compat-headless [j 1.0.78-2     Java runtime environment using
GIJ
pn  libapache2-mod-jk           <none>       (no description available)
ii  sun-java5-jre [java-virtual 1.5.0-17-0.1 Sun Java(TM) Runtime
Environment (
pn  tomcat5.5-admin             <none>       (no description available)
pn  tomcat5.5-webapps           <none>       (no description available)

-- no debconf informationx[A




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 5.5.26-5

Hello,

Some (long) time ago you filed this bug against tomcat5.5 or a related 
package. In the meantime the tomcat5.5 package has been renamed and this 
bug was "lost". Since the bug is already quite old now it is being 
closed.

If the issue you encountered is still present in recent tomcat packages 
(as released with Debian 7.0 wheezy for example) the maintainer(s) would 
very much appreciate a fresh report using:

    reportbug <package>

You should also mention the number of this bug if you think it contains 
valuable information.

Please note that further information sent to this bug is likely to 
remain unread, because the bug is currently not assigned to any existing 
package.


Thank you for for trying to improve Debian by reporting bugs.

Kind regards,
Andrei (with no relation to tomcat maintenance)

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to