Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2013 18:48:33 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#452365: fixed in tar 1.26+dfsg-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #452365,
regarding tar -cO . | tar -xC ../newplace - results in a killed symlinks
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
452365: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=452365
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tar
Version: 1.19-1
Severity: important


Yesterday trying to move my root fs to a new location, while doing these
steps:

mount -o bind,ro / /mnt/mnt
cd /mnt/mnt
tar -cO . | tar -xC ../newplace

The result was about fifty or more persent of symlinks were damaged at a 
new location. In a place of symlink there was a file with the same name 
and a zero size. After the second try I saw that symlink do not damages 
regulary and those were killed in the first try can be copied in the 
second but not the all.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages tar depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.6.1-6    GNU C Library: Shared libraries

tar recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tar
Source-Version: 1.26+dfsg-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tar, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bdale Garbee <[email protected]> (supplier of updated tar package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 12:12:35 -0600
Source: tar
Binary: tar
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.26+dfsg-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bdale Garbee <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Bdale Garbee <[email protected]>
Description: 
 tar        - GNU version of the tar archiving utility
Closes: 452365
Changes: 
 tar (1.26+dfsg-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * cherry-pick upstream commit at Paul Eggert's suggestion to address link
     extraction issue, closes: #452365
Checksums-Sha1: 
 ceaac44bcd7834201af0c20ed0bb98dc5f97cc65 1796 tar_1.26+dfsg-6.dsc
 005f901313d40f239bad99808257400c9698cbeb 35505 tar_1.26+dfsg-6.debian.tar.gz
 7ab77c13f730e24982ada6e781a8f90c29cdc64a 984012 tar_1.26+dfsg-6_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 88552f05f5fde198a713785c7ed26b48469d98a4d312a00b094fb5ab2f6fec21 1796 
tar_1.26+dfsg-6.dsc
 ce42facbb2fa67d461692abe295d6230e88c071eebd34042cd143537bfa5287e 35505 
tar_1.26+dfsg-6.debian.tar.gz
 60c8efc84f374ad9cd2abf2baccb78bbe727189ea8c94a13ea5da4c176a438ae 984012 
tar_1.26+dfsg-6_i386.deb
Files: 
 d1fde95beb181d48b2b77afb6b623a5f 1796 utils required tar_1.26+dfsg-6.dsc
 89ce2a26f638d1930a2bb29f02763f98 35505 utils required 
tar_1.26+dfsg-6.debian.tar.gz
 e279b31c8288d579fcc37982f0066ef8 984012 utils required tar_1.26+dfsg-6_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=LYYP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to