Your message dated Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:58:09 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336785: apt-proxy: cross arch support
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2005 14:01:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 01 06:01:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gpm.stappers.nl [213.84.119.166]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EWwhe-0004R8-00; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 06:01:30 -0800
Received: by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 61FDA794A0; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:50:14 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:50:14 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: apt-proxy: cross arch support
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Cjvo8w+V8lMs5Jsv"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--Cjvo8w+V8lMs5Jsv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: apt-proxy
Version: 1.9.32
Severity: minor
Hello,
Is cross architecture support possible?
Example given:
a sparc as apt-proxy server
with i386 apt-proxy clients
GSt, submitter of #336779
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-sparc64
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages apt-proxy depends on:
ii adduser 3.66 Add and remove users and groups
ii bzip2 1.0.2-10 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.56 Debian configuration management sy
ii logrotate 3.7.1-1 Log rotation utility
ii python 2.3.5-3 An interactive high-level object-o
ii python-apt 0.6.13.1 Python interface to libapt-pkg
ii python-bsddb3 3.3.0-6 Python interface to libdb3
ii python-twisted 2.0.1-5 Event-based framework for internet
ii python2.3 2.3.5-6 An interactive high-level object-o
apt-proxy recommends no packages.
-- debconf information:
apt-proxy/upgrading-v2:
apt-proxy/upgrading-v2-result:
--Cjvo8w+V8lMs5Jsv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDZ3KWOSINbgwa/7sRAnWDAJ0dJ39pZMnUsaT05tf+6lsJB0hojgCdHQbK
O7wM/ISKgjSaCWbzbsnyIB8=
=O9u9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Cjvo8w+V8lMs5Jsv--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 336785-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2005 14:58:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 01 06:58:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EWxai-0006L6-00; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 06:58:24 -0800
Received: from i-83-67-59-194.freedom2surf.net [83.67.59.194]
(helo=feathers.thehalls.de)
by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis),
id 0MKwh2-1EWxah0GvC-0008Uv; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 15:58:23 +0100
Received: by feathers.thehalls.de (Postfix, from userid 1050)
id E7A32804D; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:58:12 +0000 (GMT)
From: Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#336785: apt-proxy: cross arch support
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:58:09 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
login:b46e2b357ea7d4f6cadf4c99fb902606
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Tuesday 01 Nov 2005 13:50, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Is cross architecture support possible?
> Example given:
> a sparc as apt-proxy server
> with i386 apt-proxy clients
That is fine - the files in the archive have a different path name depending
on the architecture of the package. apt-proxy does not care about the
architecture of the files that it serves. You just need to make sure your
backend server has all of the architectures you need.
Closing this bug since it seems to be more of a question than a bug report.
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
