Your message dated Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:47:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line openssl: please version symbols
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2003 11:42:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 12 05:42:45 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net [200.196.10.6]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18ivHp-0000Zf-00; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 05:42:45 -0600
Received: by khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8314E102F7; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:42:42 -0200 (BRST)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:42:42 -0200
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: openssl: please version symbols
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.10
X-GPG-Fingerprint-1: 1024D/128D36EE 50AC 661A 7963 0BBA 8155 43D5 6EF7 F36B
128D 36EE
X-GPG-Fingerprint-2: 1024D/1CDB0FE3 5422 5C61 F6B7 06FB 7E04 3738 EE25 DE3F
1CDB 0FE3
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: openssl
Version: 0.9.7-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Please version symbols in openssl. This library change sonames in a most
hideous way, and every time it does it it causes major havok in the
distribution, since both old and new versions of this library end up being
linked at the same time. IT BREAKS SOFTWARE IN THE ENTIRE SYSTEM IN A MOST
INSIDUOUS AND SNEAKY WAY!
Versioning symbols to SSL0.9.7 for example (or OPENSSL0.9.7) would fix the
problems once and for all. Conflicting with the old openssl packages would
help us detect the breakage, but it would not be really fair, since it is
perfectly ok to have some apps using 0.9.6 and others using 0.9.7... as
long as the library dependency chain doesn't bring in BOTH.
Don't count on upstream for this, BSD has no concept of versioned symbols.
Maybe they will have the foresight and accept a patch that activates
versioned symbols only in Linux and Solaris, but I would not count on it.
Sending the version patch to RedHat, Suse, Mandrake and others would be a
good idea, as well.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux khazad-dum 2.4.18 #1 Sat May 11 19:16:08 BRT 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR
Versions of packages openssl depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7-4 SSL shared libraries
ii perl 5.8.0-15 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
-- no debconf information
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 180725-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2005 19:47:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 01 11:47:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EX26J-0001oe-00; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:47:19 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id B55B038168
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:47:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74])
by hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7139381A9
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:47:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 8F8D826136; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:47:18 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:47:18 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: openssl: please version symbols
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Version: 0.9.8a-1
Hi,
This should have been fixed in the 0.9.8a-1, and really is a
duplicate of #333349. But I don't see the point of merging after
it's closed.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
