Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2005 14:32:23 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324611: fixed in dirmngr 0.9.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2005 00:14:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 22 17:14:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E7MQo-0008U2-00; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 17:14:22 -0700
Received: from (localhost.localdomain) [213.183.15.80]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1E7MQn-0003IG-00; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:14:21 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Thomas Frauendorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dirmngr: Should declare versioned dependency on libksba8
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.16
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 02:14:10 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: dirmngr
Version: 0.9.2-1
Severity: normal
On updating dirmngr I got the following error:
dirmngr[6427]: Fatal: libksba is too old (need 0.9.11, have 0.9.8)
Updating libksba8 to version 0.9.11-1 solved the problem, so dirmngr
should declare a versioned dependendy on libksba8 (>= 0.9.11-1)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (800, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (550, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages dirmngr depends on:
ii adduser 3.66 Add and remove users and groups
ii libc6 2.3.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcrypt11 1.2.0-11.1 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii libgpg-error0 1.1-4 library for common error values an
ii libksba8 0.9.9-2 X.509 and CMS support library
ii libldap2 2.1.30-8 OpenLDAP libraries
ii libpth2 2.0.1-2 The GNU Portable Threads
ii lsb-base 3.0-1 Linux Standard Base 2.0 init scrip
dirmngr recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 324611-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2005 22:40:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 01 14:40:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EX4g3-000384-00; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 14:32:23 -0800
From: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#324611: fixed in dirmngr 0.9.3-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 14:32:23 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: dirmngr
Source-Version: 0.9.3-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dirmngr, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
dirmngr_0.9.3-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/dirmngr/dirmngr_0.9.3-1.diff.gz
dirmngr_0.9.3-1.dsc
to pool/main/d/dirmngr/dirmngr_0.9.3-1.dsc
dirmngr_0.9.3-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/dirmngr/dirmngr_0.9.3-1_i386.deb
dirmngr_0.9.3.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/dirmngr/dirmngr_0.9.3.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dirmngr package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:20:33 +0100
Source: dirmngr
Binary: dirmngr
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
dirmngr - server for managing certificate revocation lists
Closes: 324611 336482
Changes:
dirmngr (0.9.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
* Properly encoded non-ASCII characters in the man pages
* Removed redundant debian/docs file
* Rebuild against new libksba should prevent partial upgrades
(closes: #324611)
* Only chmod/chgrp the socket when the server is really being started
(closes: #336482)
Files:
0404bdc84d537420fe07c226ec33678d 725 utils optional dirmngr_0.9.3-1.dsc
b981a96eea07a2c2892e0a630fa495ca 587309 utils optional
dirmngr_0.9.3.orig.tar.gz
4b767ed9a2f2d221c5cc9ba38eff2270 9719 utils optional dirmngr_0.9.3-1.diff.gz
3344be2008f413e5a647e6162324009b 180716 utils optional dirmngr_0.9.3-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDZ+P8TTx8oVVPtMYRAuvlAJ9OppxCTaDiPfmjaMHcjwWb2QvVmwCdEhCt
NTFLqz9bo+j0yktT/d3F99U=
=Wd0x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
