Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2013 22:30:06 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line ngspice: rework-20 requires dpkg (>= 1.15)
has caused the Debian Bug report #567020,
regarding ngspice: rework-20 requires dpkg (>= 1.15)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
567020: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567020
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ngspice
Version: 19-1
Severity: wishlist
I'm still using version 19 (rework 19) because the latest rework 20, in
debian, requires a version of dpkg that is not in debian lenny. Is this
really necessary? rework 19 works fine with lenny's dpkg
version. Could the version requirement be lowered if this is not
critical?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.27.44-dt.1-amd64 (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages ngspice depends on:
ii libc6 2.7-18lenny2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libice6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libsm6 2:1.0.3-2 X11 Session Management library
ii libx11-6 2:1.1.5-2 X11 client-side library
ii libxaw7 2:1.0.4-2 X11 Athena Widget library
ii libxext6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii libxmu6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii libxt6 1:1.0.5-3 X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ngspice recommends no packages.
ngspice suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ngspice
Version: 19-1
Hi
Unless you are backporting a package I recommend that you lower the
dependency yourself and rebuild the package.
Regards
Gudjon
--- End Message ---
