Your message dated Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:00:24 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: [newmaint-site] Email From address (was Re:  Welcome, and 
news on nm.debian.org)
has caused the Debian Bug report #691554,
regarding nm.debian.org: Uses (possibly) obsolete user mail address
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
691554: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691554
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: nm.debian.org

Hi!

It appears the nm site is using the mail address that was used when
starting the application process, for all kinds of things. In my case
but possibly for others too, that address ([email protected])
is non-functional right now (it should actually be bouncing). But I
see it at least, in the advocacy generated mails:

  <https://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2012/06/msg00069.html>

and in the links to DDPO, etc, once logged in, and while those links
still work (I'm guessing because that address is still listed on my
old GPG key), they might stop working once the revoked ID gets
accepted by keyring.debian.org, or I switch to a new key.

For historical purposes keeping that address in the db seems fine,
but for functional ones, using the @debian.org address (for DDs) would
be the safest option (I'm not sure using the fowarding address would
be a good idea, as some people might want to keep it secret?).

thanks,
guillem

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:22:36AM +0200, Santiago wrote:

> Here you have a patch to send advocay and other  messages from 
> <login>@debian.org 
> when sender is a DD. I've tested the changes Enrico asked for. (Closes: 
> #691554)

Perfect, thanks! I removed the prints, applied the patch and deployed
it. I've let jwilk know and taken the item off the TODO list.


Ciao,

Enrico

-- 
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <[email protected]>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to