Your message dated Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:37:11 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#671464: nslcd: Please mark /etc/nslcd.conf as conffile
has caused the Debian Bug report #671464,
regarding nslcd: Please mark /etc/nslcd.conf as conffile
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
671464: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671464
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: nslcd
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
* debconf does not lead to a working nslcd.conf in all corner cases.
administrator need to hand tune options inside.
* However /etc/nslcd.conf is not in the list of conffiles for nslcd.
new nslcd.conf is generated during nslcd upgrade and administrator
has to overwrite back the hand-tuned version herself.
* Please consider adding /etc/nslcd.conf to conffile to preserve it
across package upgrades.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 12:24 +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 19:04 +0900, XU Benda wrote:
> > * Please consider adding /etc/nslcd.conf to conffile to preserve it
> > across package upgrades.
>
> You cannot flag a file as conffile and both do configuration with
> debconf because maintainer scripts are not allowed to touch conffiles.
I'm closing this bug. I believe the underlying problem is fixed in the
cloned bug #672301. Also #717063 describes another somewhat related (and
now fixed) problem.
Thanks,
--
-- arthur - [email protected] - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
