Your message dated Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:13:16 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#717917: RM: libnss-ldap -- RoQA; orphaned, RC buggy, 
alternatives exist
has caused the Debian Bug report #717917,
regarding RM: libnss-ldap -- RoQA; orphaned, RC buggy, alternatives exist
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
717917: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717917
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal


Hello,

Please see the following reasons for the removal request:

* Orphaned.
* RC buggy.
* Alternatives exist (libnss-ldapd, sssd).


Thank you,

-- 
Barry deFreese
Sometimes helper, sometimes hinderer to:
Debian Games, QA, GNU/Hurd

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 06:11:05PM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 09:30 -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> > I have been working on these for a couple of weeks.  I even spent the
> > time updating to the latest upstreams and fixing up the packaging.
> 
> Do you have this in a VCS somewhere? I'd be happy to contribute.
> 
> > However, the consensus seems to be to just get rid of them since no
> > one seems to care for them.  Libnss-ldap has been broken for at least
> > 2 releases.
> 
> I'm not convinced the packages are so broken they're unusable for most
> users.
> 
> Another situation in which libpam-ldap is still useful: with
> nss-pam-ldapd the LDAP servers configured are the same for NSS and PAM
> while pam_ldap can also be provided with a config parameter that would
> allow LDAP authentication against a different LDAP server per
> authentication service.
> 
> > I am also concerned about the high popcon, however, so far I have been
> > unsuccessful in actually finding a user that actually uses it that
> > could do any real testing for me..  I am not particularly familiar
> > with ldap myself.
> 
> As I'm the maintainer of nss-pam-ldapd I can test the packages in my
> test environment but I don't use it anywhere in production. Perhaps
> someone from Ubuntu is also interested in helping out.

Since there was a recent QA upload by Barry and Arthur, I'm closing this bug.

Cheers,
        Moritz

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to