Your message dated Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:46:19 +0100
with message-id <20131119104619.GD3988@faye>
and subject line Bug#613991: iftop: not a top-list based on ip adresses but on
port numbers
has caused the Debian Bug report #613991,
regarding iftop: not a top-list based on ip adresses but on port numbers
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
613991: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613991
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: iftop
Version: 0.17-16
Severity: wishlist
iftop: not a top-list based on ip adresses but on port numbers
that way one can more easily find at runtime what protocol uses the most traffic
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages iftop depends on:
ii libc6 2.11.2-6 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii libncurses5 5.7+20100313-3 shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libpcap0.8 1.1.1-2 system interface for user-level pa
iftop recommends no packages.
iftop suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
The developer of iftop pointed out to me how it is already possible to
group the traffic according to local port.
Press s, d, S.
s = hide source host
d = hide dest host
S = show dest port
See also
http://lists.beasts.org/pipermail/iftop-users/2013-November/000393.html
I think that is exactly what was requested, so I believe that this issue
could be resolved and I'm closing this bug report now.
Regards,
Markus
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
