Your message dated Fri, 11 Nov 2005 21:47:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336357: ntfsprogs: ntfsmount does not function.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Oct 2005 17:55:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 29 10:55:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.80] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EVuvg-0000oy-00; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:55:44 -0700
Received: (qmail 41873 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2005 17:55:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO tippler) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@69.194.184.40 with 
login)
  by smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Oct 2005 17:55:12 -0000
Received: by tippler (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id E87442330E0; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 13:55:17 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 13:55:17 -0400
From: Jeff Bonham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ntfsprogs: ntfsmount does not function
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
X-GnuPG-Key: BA289747
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: ntfsprogs
Version: 1.11.2-3
Severity: important

The ntfsmount FUSE module does not work as described in the man page.
When I tried to mount a Windows XP NTFS partition with it, the following
error occurred:

$ sudo ntfsmount /windows -o dev=3D/dev/hda1
fusermount: mount failed: Invalid argument
fuse_mount failed.
Unmounting: WINXP

hda1 mounts fine using the Linux kernel's NTFS driver.  I'm using Linux
2.6.14 with the built-in FUSE support.  This is the exact syntax
specified in the man page.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8)

Versions of packages ntfsprogs depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.3.5-7    GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii  libfuse2                      2.4.0-1    Filesystem in USErspace library
ii  libntfs7                      1.11.2-3   library that provides common N=
TFS=20

ntfsprogs recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--=20
Jeff Bonham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key ID: BA289747

--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDY7eFbXw8JLool0cRAkOZAKDDQI/XJ5IuUQaoVO18FkIdXFwfdQCg6bmA
uSce1sXFa8r/fJ/L1CEPRa4=
=t2R0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 336357-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Nov 2005 20:48:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 11 12:48:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cerrojo.elmundo.es ([193.110.128.12] helo=mail2.elmundo.es)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EafoX-0001X2-LI
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:48:01 -0800
Received: from xanes.el-mundo.int (xanes.elmundo.int [10.5.222.50])
        by mail2.elmundo.es (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id A1425460DE; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 21:48:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix, from userid 65500)
        id 855B217315; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 21:47:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (xanes.elmundo.int [10.5.222.50])
        by xanes.el-mundo.int (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 6378417313; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 21:47:58 +0100 (CET)
From: David =?iso-8859-15?q?Mart=EDnez_Moreno?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Debian
To: Jeff Bonham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#336357: ntfsprogs: ntfsmount does not function.
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 21:47:40 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart2194666.e2ePld8F1n";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.358495, version=0.10.3
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

--nextPart2194666.e2ePld8F1n
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: 1.12.1-1

El mi=E9rcoles, 9 de noviembre de 2005 03:37, Jeff Bonham escribi=F3:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:47:45AM +0100, David Mart=EDnez Moreno wrote:
> >     Yes, thanks for the warning. :-( Two days after your mail the ftpmaste=
rs
> > obviously rejected the upload. I have prepared new packages, and they a=
re
> > in the same location. Please test them and report.
>
> The new packages work great, thanks.

        I am glad to hear that. :-)

        Thank you very much for your bug report.


                Ender.
=2D-=20
Network engineer
Debian Developer

--nextPart2194666.e2ePld8F1n
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDdQN9Ws/EhA1iABsRAsL8AKDAaHtYhmU71CYqoqouJw96MnmShQCfa2EV
VF0rXB95Q1rkT5UwIHoKAP0=
=Rnf8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2194666.e2ePld8F1n--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to