Your message dated Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:40:57 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line shellutils: printf does not conform to susv2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 1999 20:32:03 +0000
Received: (qmail 24656 invoked from network); 17 Oct 1999 20:32:03 -0000
Received: from arwen.cs.berkeley.edu (128.32.33.72)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 17 Oct 1999 20:32:03 -0000
Received: by arwen.cs.berkeley.edu
via sendmail from stdin
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.102)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 17 Oct 1999 20:32:02 +0000 (GMT)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 20:32:02 +0000 (GMT)
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: shellutils: printf does not conform to Single UNIX v2
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bcc:
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.6
Package: shellutils
Version: 2.0-2
Severity: normal
According to the Single UNIX v2 specification, the format argument of
printf must interpret the octal escape sequences \ddd (a backslash
followed by one to three octal digits), whereas the %b conversion
interprets octal escape sequences \0ddd (a backslash followed by 0
followed by zero to three octal digits).
The shellutils printf interprets the \0ddd form in the format argument,
instead of the \ddd form.
http://www.UNIX-systems.org/online.html
-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux arwen 2.2.7 #6 Thu May 20 00:19:56 GMT 1999 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages shellutils depends on:
ii libc6 2.1.2-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
ii login 19990827-5 System login tools
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 47671-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2005 02:40:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 12 18:40:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.46])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Eb7ne-0001j0-FO
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 18:40:58 -0800
Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([70.108.64.202])
by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep
9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:40:58 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B05D606646 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:40:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (osgiliath [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 05755-02-4 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat,
12 Nov 2005 21:40:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2E7D66001D6; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:40:57 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:40:57 -0500
From: Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: shellutils: printf does not conform to susv2
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-disposition: inline
X-Pgp-Fingerprint: 53 FF 38 00 E7 DD 0A 9C 84 52 84 C5 EE DF 7C 88
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at mathom.us
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Version: 5.2.1-1
printf interprets \0nnn sequences properly at least as far back as the
sarge coreutils
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
