Your message dated Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:04:46 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ls should use human_B when using human_base_1024
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2003 16:15:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 10 11:15:41 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (moby3.everets.org) [64.39.191.29]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19EX0f-0001Kx-00; Sat, 10 May 2003 11:15:41 -0500
Received: from kevin by moby3.everets.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19EX0Z-000127-00; Sat, 10 May 2003 12:15:35 -0400
From: Kevin Everets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: coreutils: ls (and others) should use human_B when using
human_base_1024
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 12:15:35 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: coreutils
Version: 5.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
To reduce confusion the output of 'ls -h' should use the proper suffixes when
using a base of 1024 (that is, MiB for 1,048,576 Bytes, GiB for 1,073,741,824
Bytes, etc).
For ls, this can be done with the following patch:
--- ls.c.orig 2003-03-19 18:01:51.000000000 -0500
+++ ls.c 2003-05-10 12:04:58.000000000 -0400
@@ -1413,7 +1413,7 @@
break;
case 'h':
- human_output_opts = human_autoscale | human_SI | human_base_1024;
+ human_output_opts = human_autoscale | human_SI | human_B |
human_base_1024;
file_output_block_size = output_block_size = 1;
break;
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux moby3 2.4.20-1-k7 #1 Sat Mar 22 15:17:52 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages coreutils depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 192809-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2005 18:05:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 13 10:05:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vms042pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.42])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EbMDt-00022V-49
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 10:05:01 -0800
Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([70.108.64.202])
by vms042.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep
9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 12:04:47 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBD86031E0 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:04:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (osgiliath [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 19346-05-4 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,
13 Nov 2005 13:04:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7AED560049B; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:04:46 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:04:46 -0500
From: Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ls should use human_B when using human_base_1024
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-disposition: inline
X-Pgp-Fingerprint: 53 FF 38 00 E7 DD 0A 9C 84 52 84 C5 EE DF 7C 88
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at mathom.us
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
I'm not convinced that changing this would reduce confusion. It's
definately not an area where I want divergence in a debian patch.
Mike Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
