Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 01:02:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285765: fixed in manpages 2.05-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Dec 2004 13:36:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 15 05:36:45 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from boefje.phys.uu.nl [131.211.32.64] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CeZKf-00014W-00; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 05:36:45 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by boefje.phys.uu.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD13D3F611;
        Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:36:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from boefje.phys.uu.nl ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.phys.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 13408-10; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:36:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from matilda.phys.uu.nl (matilda.phys.uu.nl [131.211.36.104])
        by boefje.phys.uu.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34B03F631;
        Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:36:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bas by matilda.phys.uu.nl with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CeZKY-0006lt-U6; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:36:39 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: isinf() entry inaccurate
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.4
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:36:38 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at phys.uu.nl
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: manpages-dev
Version: 1.70-1
Severity: normal

The man page entry of isinf() (in fpclassify(3)) is inaccurate.
Currently, it says:

|  isinf(x)
|       returns a nonzero value if (fpclassify(x) == FP_INFINITE)
|
| NOTE
|  On systems conforming to BSD 4.3, isinf() will return 1 for positive, and -1
|  for negative infinity.

However, this last remark also seems to apply to linux (with a recent
glibc).  At least my /usr/include/bits/mathcalls.h (libc6-dev
2.3.2.ds1-19) says:

| /* Return 0 if VALUE is finite or NaN, +1 if it
|    is +Infinity, -1 if it is -Infinity.  */
| __MATHDECL_1 (int,__isinf,, (_Mdouble_ __value)) __attribute__ ((__const__));


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-ac6
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages manpages-dev depends on:
ii  manpages                      1.70-1     Manual pages about using a GNU/Lin

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 285765-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2005 09:11:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 01:11:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EbaE7-0004jt-Ql; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 01:02:11 -0800
From: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#285765: fixed in manpages 2.05-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 01:02:11 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: manpages
Source-Version: 2.05-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
manpages, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

manpages-dev_2.05-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/manpages/manpages-dev_2.05-1_all.deb
manpages_2.05-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/manpages/manpages_2.05-1.diff.gz
manpages_2.05-1.dsc
  to pool/main/m/manpages/manpages_2.05-1.dsc
manpages_2.05-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/manpages/manpages_2.05-1_all.deb
manpages_2.05.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/m/manpages/manpages_2.05.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated manpages package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:31:02 +0100
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.05-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 manpages   - Manual pages about using a GNU/Linux system
 manpages-dev - Manual pages about using GNU/Linux for development
Closes: 246668 253515 285765 305369
Changes: 
 manpages (2.05-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version, with these updates
     - Return value adjusted in fpclassify(3) (Closes: Bug#285765)
     - Include file adjustment in strtod(3) (Closes: Bug#246668)
     - s/selection/gpm/ in vcs(4) (Closes: Bug#253515)
     - Use proper signal flag in signal(7) (Closes: Bug#305369)
Files: 
 a2ef360be830eab335d9992039b350dc 584 doc - manpages_2.05-1.dsc
 fe349e6a536587a2a65878c1e3c2e424 1031281 doc - manpages_2.05.orig.tar.gz
 0f4c723e0b75c47143e33a343fe63605 44412 doc - manpages_2.05-1.diff.gz
 a5d59570331d289d80a38ce5bb728c3d 398906 doc important manpages_2.05-1_all.deb
 ac160ed7fde666b76ea3688f4f8b6472 1090416 doc standard 
manpages-dev_2.05-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDeE8RW5ql+IAeqTIRAhRZAKCTiLtyC9YdLRmUzAMcKHd2QPVRpACeMD4Q
m+ie6N7l7WkkDSC34lxya6c=
=EAJY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to