Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 23:49:24 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339428: smb.conf: ldap port option not recognized
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2005 08:50:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 16 00:50:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 62-2-48-178.business.cablecom.ch ([62.2.48.178] 
helo=localhost.localdomain)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EcJ0F-0006o1-JN
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:50:51 -0800
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 0)
        id 071F2100F796; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:50:49 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Yann Forget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: smb.conf: ldap port option not recognized
Reply-To: Yann Forget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:50:49 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: samba
Version: 3.0.14a-3
Severity: normal

Hi,

Although Samba is compiled with LDAP support, the "ldap port" parameter
is not recognized.

Thanks,
Yann

# grep ldap /etc/samba/smb.conf
   passdb backend = ldapsam:"ldap://10.0.0.13 ldap://10.0.0.10";
   ldap port = 389
   ldap filter = (&(uid=%u)(objectclass=sambaAccount))
   ldap suffix = dc=domain,dc=com
   ldap user suffix = ou=Users
   ldap group suffix = ou=Groups
   ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers
   ldap admin dn = cn=admin,dc=domain,dc=com

# testparm
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
Unknown parameter encountered: "ldap port"
Ignoring unknown parameter "ldap port"

# smbd -b |grep -i ldap
HAVE_LDAP_H
HAVE_LDAP
HAVE_LDAP_DOMAIN2HOSTLIST
HAVE_LDAP_INIT
HAVE_LDAP_INITIALIZE
HAVE_LDAP_SET_REBIND_PROC
HAVE_LIBLDAP
LDAP_SET_REBIND_PROC_ARGS
pdb_ldap pdb_smbpasswd pdb_tdbsam pdb_guest rpc_lsa rpc_reg rpc_lsa_ds rpc_wks 
rpc_net rpc_dfs rpc_srv rpc_spoolss rpc_samr idmap_ldap idmap_tdb auth_rhosts 
auth_sam auth_unix auth_winbind auth_server auth_domain auth_builtin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-drdb-1
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages samba depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]      1.4.30.13
ii  libacl1                    2.2.23-1
ii  libattr1                   2.4.16-1
ii  libc6                      2.3.5-6
ii  libcomerr2                 1.37-2sarge1
ii  libcupsys2-gnutls10        1.1.23-10
ii  libkrb53                   1.3.6-2sarge2
ii  libldap2                   2.1.30-8
ii  libpam-modules             0.76-22
ii  libpam-runtime             0.76-22
ii  libpam0g                   0.76-22
ii  libpopt0                   1.7-5
ii  logrotate                  3.7-5
ii  netbase                    4.21
ii  samba-common               3.0.14a-3

-- debconf information:
  samba/nmbd_from_inetd:
* samba/run_mode: daemons
  samba/log_files_moved:
  samba/tdbsam: false
* samba/generate_smbpasswd: true

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 339428-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2005 12:49:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 16 04:49:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150] helo=lists.samba.org)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EcMj9-0006Ij-02
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 04:49:27 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9B516384F;
        Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:49:25 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: Bug#339428: smb.conf: ldap port option not recognized
From: Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Yann Forget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; 
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-bS/8MGFwU1f8PVOgP83E"
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 23:49:24 +1100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--=-bS/8MGFwU1f8PVOgP83E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 13:39 +0100, Yann Forget wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> Andrew Bartlett a =C3=A9crit :
> > On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 09:50 +0100, Yann Forget wrote:
> >=20
> >>Package: samba
> >>Version: 3.0.14a-3
> >>Severity: normal
> >>
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Although Samba is compiled with LDAP support, the "ldap port" parameter
> >>is not recognized.
> >=20
> > This is not a supported parameter in Samba 3.0 (it was used in the
> > --with-ldapsam option in samba 2.2).
>=20
> Then how to specify the ldap port?

In the LDAP URL. =20

> > Where was this documented (this is at most a documentation bug,
> > otherwise it needs to be marked done).
>=20
> It is probably anyway, as the man page of smb.conf doesn't mention that=20
> this option is not supported in Samba 3.0.

Removed options are not documented here (as policy).  We mention them in
the WHATSNEW.=20

I don't see a bug here.  Closing.

Andrew Bartlett

--=20
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College  http://hawkerc.net

--=-bS/8MGFwU1f8PVOgP83E
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDeyrUz4A8Wyi0NrsRAm38AKCu0Pn+uy8KMt3zCUsPfBe1LF0gLwCeNDib
rmC8RMrHg5DgLozPpfvcwrk=
=z7gy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-bS/8MGFwU1f8PVOgP83E--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to