Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:47:18 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#336350: fixed in xfsprogs 2.7.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Oct 2005 16:39:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 29 09:39:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tomts22.bellnexxia.net (tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net)
[209.226.175.184]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EVtk2-0000L8-00; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 09:39:38 -0700
Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.50.215.163])
by tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:39:37 -0400
From: Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xfsprogs should use isize=512 by default
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:39:34 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: xfsprogs
Version: 2.6.36-1
Hello,
I was contemplating creating an XFS partition, and in the process of
verifying that XFS works with SELinux, came across this thread:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-selinux-list/2004-October/msg00023.html
It indicates that for optimal operation with SELinux, XFS should use an
inode size of 512 instead of the default 256. Thus I would suggest that
Debian's xfsprogs default to 512 (instead of the normal 256), to ensure
that future users of XFS and SELinux have an optimal experience, without
having to know about this little quirk.
Thanks,
Christopher Martin
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 336350-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2005 22:51:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 16 14:51:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EcW3i-00038z-OV; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:47:18 -0800
From: Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#336350: fixed in xfsprogs 2.7.7-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:47:18 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: xfsprogs
Source-Version: 2.7.7-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfsprogs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xfslibs-dev_2.7.7-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfsprogs/xfslibs-dev_2.7.7-1_i386.deb
xfsprogs-udeb_2.7.7-1_i386.udeb
to pool/main/x/xfsprogs/xfsprogs-udeb_2.7.7-1_i386.udeb
xfsprogs_2.7.7-1.dsc
to pool/main/x/xfsprogs/xfsprogs_2.7.7-1.dsc
xfsprogs_2.7.7-1.tar.gz
to pool/main/x/xfsprogs/xfsprogs_2.7.7-1.tar.gz
xfsprogs_2.7.7-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfsprogs/xfsprogs_2.7.7-1_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xfsprogs package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:32:35 +1100
Source: xfsprogs
Binary: xfsprogs-udeb xfslibs-dev xfsprogs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.7.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
xfslibs-dev - XFS filesystem-specific static libraries and headers
xfsprogs - Utilities for managing the XFS filesystem
xfsprogs-udeb - A stripped-down version of xfsprogs, for debian-installer
(udeb)
Closes: 249429 336350 338207
Changes:
xfsprogs (2.7.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release.
* Add support for (optional) ATTR2 format extension (closes: #336350)
* Allow gcc -pedantic option for C++ <xfs.h> users (closes: #249429)
* Fix segv in xfs_db frag command (closes: #338207)
Files:
57698965b78d61b5dbb03424f8f7649b 571 admin optional xfsprogs_2.7.7-1.dsc
88d98bcd4f2c4138124414c5110b10f1 866084 admin optional xfsprogs_2.7.7-1.tar.gz
fe7449f507ed814bde6677fa378c38c9 1055844 admin optional
xfsprogs_2.7.7-1_i386.deb
b1cd6763cb55aa64b4e05b672dc45f8a 280684 libdevel extra
xfslibs-dev_2.7.7-1_i386.deb
2a6cc295e660cdc3b65f2e481a39e424 125304 debian-installer optional
xfsprogs-udeb_2.7.7-1_i386.udeb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDe7SNm8fl3HSIa2MRAu7yAKCLKiHa1m9K9PyYPyWdEnco+IDZggCfbDKz
2f7+w1ahcchHSIoaLe08y0E=
=Jvua
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
