Your message dated Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:13:15 -0500
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#636955: mount doesn't show aufs partition
has caused the Debian Bug report #636955,
regarding mount doesn't show aufs partition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
636955: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636955
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-686-pae
Version: 2.6.39-2-686-pae
# cat /etc/fstab
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# Use 'blkid' to print the universally unique identifier for a
# device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices
# that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5).
#
# <file system> <mount point> <type> <options> <dump> <pass>
proc /proc proc defaults 0 0
# / was on /dev/md0 during installation
UUID=a3c2cd46-a4c2-427a-ae70-8116a72fc933 / ext4
errors=remount-ro 0 1
# /storage1 was on /dev/sdb3 during installation
UUID=4ed29390-659c-48a1-9bad-1ae48fea76c6 /storage1 xfs
noatime 0 2
# /storage2 was on /dev/sdc1 during installation
UUID=e48ca8b0-fa05-4c11-bcc8-939c721ddbf0 /storage2 xfs
noatime 0 2
# /storage3 was on /dev/sde1 during installation
UUID=ca59b908-cd61-4a59-acc2-5b8a8af8d680 /storage3 xfs
noatime 0 2
# /storage4 was on /dev/sdf1 during installation
UUID=aabce5c6-e0e0-46a3-a859-f3be6828f4e6 /storage4 xfs
noatime 0 2
# /storage5 was on /dev/sdd3 during installation
UUID=87671d7e-8716-4b06-aab9-ece6b3e00847 /storage5 xfs
noatime 0 2
# /storage6 was on /dev/sdg1 during installation
UUID=67eaff1e-1506-4e57-bb38-0458133f69bb /storage6 xfs
noatime 0 2
# /storage7 was on /dev/sdh1 during installation
UUID=7b0ec344-3515-43c3-9722-f74f43e1b2c0 /storage7 xfs
noatime 0 2
# /storage8 was on /dev/sdi1 during installation
UUID=d5fa34ca-acf8-4433-9e3d-7bac23fe4b59 /storage8 xfs
noatime 0 2
# swap was on /dev/sdb2 during installation
UUID=781cc55b-d6d1-4290-a32c-e8a35712b24e none swap sw
0 0
# swap was on /dev/sdd2 during installation
UUID=c75afe68-1edb-43e7-91e6-703733865b18 none swap sw
0 0
none /storage aufs
udba=reval,sum,create=mfsrr:20971520,br:/storage1=rw:/storage2=rw:/storage3=rw:/storage4=rw:/storage5=rw:/storage6=rw:/storage7=rw:/storage8=rw
# mount
/dev/md0 on / type ext4 (rw,errors=remount-ro)
tmpfs on /lib/init/rw type tmpfs
(rw,nosuid,size=5242880,mode=755,size=5242880,mode=755)
tmpfs on /run type tmpfs
(rw,noexec,nosuid,size=10%,mode=755,size=10%,mode=755)
tmpfs on /run/lock type tmpfs
(rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,size=5242880,mode=1777,size=5242880,mode=1777)
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs
(rw,nosuid,nodev,size=20%,mode=1777,size=20%,mode=1777)
proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
udev on /dev type tmpfs (rw,mode=0755)
tmpfs on /run/shm type tmpfs
(rw,nosuid,nodev,size=20%,mode=1777,size=20%,mode=1777)
devpts on /dev/pts type devpts
(rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=620,gid=5,mode=620)
/dev/sda3 on /storage1 type xfs (rw,noatime)
/dev/sdb1 on /storage2 type xfs (rw,noatime)
/dev/sdd1 on /storage3 type xfs (rw,noatime)
/dev/sde1 on /storage4 type xfs (rw,noatime)
/dev/sdc3 on /storage5 type xfs (rw,noatime)
/dev/sdf1 on /storage6 type xfs (rw,noatime)
/dev/sdg1 on /storage7 type xfs (rw,noatime)
/dev/sdh1 on /storage8 type xfs (rw,noatime)
# ls /sys/fs/aufs/si_f7eb3586/
br0 br1 br2 br3 br4 br5 br6 br7 xi_path
Aufs partion is mounted, but not shown by commads mount, df
--
WBR, Andrey Vasilishin CDIG1-UANIC, CDIG1-RIPE
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 02/08/2014 03:53 AM, Андрей Василишин wrote:
>> /etc/mtab has been removed, are you still seeing this today?
>
> No, I don't
Thanks for the reply, I will close the bug then.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJS9kmLAAoJEI5FoCIzSKrwxl8IAIV7Ij/9Ms37bjf+1jpRCb/8
h85yNPPal35ywgsqRGzC/81y/nmcDSgjeoXnrD0pbaAibwdiWcaGBOSoBTAq5AoM
9yBXJjDhnw9BhFdEyGNcC1mYsImuofq5lq8G2VR1XZXMFyjU6zqBEfamHm1LVI+y
3RZPiDMYWDnwajcuxdwmLeN3QNFikCGhWupGh8yifhlchphn7FYyDqTBZHKzDBrJ
mWLG6h5/JikRMdvKHY8bRdchXEmmhRynt4I93KZDNyX/NQcEZ+JwDMAuqxEVNFtL
Ud3QrL/mhUXNiMvUNv+M6vkax7R5lUxpnztyhpUJiklb8+s1ULMTY9XmqXy0GRc=
=r5hz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---