Your message dated Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:13:19 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line unreproducible by anyone
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 17:37:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 15 09:37:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net ([204.127.198.43])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ec4kZ-00085f-Jt
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:37:45 -0800
Received: from snowball
(pcp09437864pcs.lascruces.nm.albuq.comcast.net[69.241.161.80])
by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP
id <2005111517371201400npps7e>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 17:37:12 +0000
Received: from pfeiffer by snowball with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ec4k3-0005mq-00; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:37:11 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joe Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: aptitude: forbid command isn't sticky
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:37:11 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joe Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.2.15.9-7
Severity: normal
If I forbid a broken version of a package (for instance, mime-codecs
7.19-7) in aptitude, leave aptitude, and then run aptitude again, the
F flag is gone (and the package gets upgraded to the broken version
unless I re-set the F flag).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (650, 'stable'), (600, 'unstable'), (500,
'oldstable'), (500, 'hoary')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12snowball
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages aptitude depends on:
ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.1 0.6.42.1 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii libc6 2.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library
ii libsigc++-1.2-5c2 1.2.5-5 type-safe Signal Framework for C++
ii libstdc++6 4.0.2-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
Versions of packages aptitude recommends:
pn aptitude-doc-en | aptitude-do <none> (no description available)
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 339347-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Nov 2005 22:16:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 17 14:16:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.vzavenue.net ([66.171.59.140])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ecs3N-0007Wy-Kl
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:16:25 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain (244.173.171.66.subscriber.vzavenue.net
[66.171.173.244])
by smtp.vzavenue.net (MOS 3.7.1-GA)
with ESMTP id DHR51154;
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:13:20 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:13:19 -0800
From: Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: unreproducible by anyone
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Junkmail-Status: score=0/50, host=smtp.vzavenue.net
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
The reporter apparently can't reproduce this either, so I'm closing it.
Daniel
--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDfQB/ch6xsM7kSXgRApInAKDE7yLK3v15hWtLVhBETdvuPiwRswCgxMgC
pvWFTNzi7bBf5T+71K/Xs1w=
=xlE1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
