Your message dated Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:08:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339636: psutils: Does not check for build-dependencies
(when backporting)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Nov 2005 18:08:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 17 10:08:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mrelay3.uni-hannover.de ([130.75.2.41] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EcoBc-00028m-DF
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:08:40 -0800
Received: from mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (mail.itp.uni-hannover.de
[130.75.25.242])
by mrelay3.uni-hannover.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
jAHI8WJ3028982
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:08:33 +0100 (MET)
Received: from zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de (zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de
[130.75.25.91])
by mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4711B82A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:08:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: by zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix, from userid 237)
id 489611A6CC; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:08:27 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:08:27 +0100
From: Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: psutils: Does not check for build-dependencies (when backporting)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm/data/kreutzm.gpg
X-homepage: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.2.2
(mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41]); Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:08:33 +0100 (MET)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mrelay3.uni-hannover.de
id jAHI8WJ3028982
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: psutils
Version: 1.17-20
Severity: normal
I wanted to do a backport of psutils to Sarge. The build died,
however, with
gcc -g -Wall -O2 -c -o psspec.o psspec.c
gcc -o pstops psutil.o psspec.o pserror.o pstops.o -lpaper
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpaper
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [pstops] Fehler 1
make[1]: Verlasse Verzeichnis
=BB/scr/build/debian/NEU-S/psutils-1.17.orig=AB
make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Fehler 2
I checkd, but e.g. the alpha autobuilder (on sid) build it fine, so
the dependencies seem to be ok. I checked debian/control, and yes, I
do *not* have libpaper-dev:
No packages found matching libpaper-dev.
Unfortunately, I never used cdbs, so I am a little lost here. There
are three options:
a) cdbs is broken on Sarge (amd64)
b) there is a (subtle) problem with cdbs and backporting (then a
versioned dependency would be needed)
c) dpkg-buildpackage is broken on Sarge (amd64)
I am willing to assist you in finding this out if you tell me, what I
should check for (is there a way, to tell cdbs to run verbose?).=20
I also think the severity is too low, but before we
drive some horses crazy, we should look for the real cause :-))
And yes, it build fine after installing libpaper-dev.
Why do you still depend on debhelper, btw.?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.deb-7-grsec
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages psutils depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared librar=
ies an
ii libpaper1 1.1.14-3 Library for handling paper c=
haract
-- no debconf information
--=20
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
over.de
gpg signed mail preferred=20
64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kr=
eutzm
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 339636-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Nov 2005 16:08:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 18 08:08:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mrelay3.uni-hannover.de ([130.75.2.41] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ed8nJ-0007r2-SG
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 08:08:58 -0800
Received: from mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (mail.itp.uni-hannover.de
[130.75.25.242])
by mrelay3.uni-hannover.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
jAIG8oJ3002467;
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:08:50 +0100 (MET)
Received: from zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de (zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de
[130.75.25.91])
by mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id EF02E1B77A; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:08:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: by zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix, from userid 237)
id 904451A6CC; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:08:45 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:08:45 +0100
From: Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#339636: psutils: Does not check for build-dependencies (when
backporting)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm/data/kreutzm.gpg
X-homepage: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.2.2
(mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41]); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:08:50 +0100 (MET)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Jay,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 10:48:25PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wanted to do a backport of psutils to Sarge. The build died,
> > however, with
> > gcc -g -Wall -O2 -c -o psspec.o psspec.c
> > gcc -o pstops psutil.o psspec.o pserror.o pstops.o -lpaper
> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpaper
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > make[1]: *** [pstops] Fehler 1
> > make[1]: Verlasse Verzeichnis
> > =BB/scr/build/debian/NEU-S/psutils-1.17.orig=AB
> > make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Fehler 2
> >
> > I checkd, but e.g. the alpha autobuilder (on sid) build it fine, so
> > the dependencies seem to be ok. I checked debian/control, and yes, I
> > do *not* have libpaper-dev:
>=20
> My sarge system has libpaper-dev. Are you sure your
Well, I can install it (and in fact, I did so after encountering this
error and then I rebuild psutils just fine).
> /etc/apt/sources.list is okay or you don't have some other problem
> with libpaper-dev on your system? I'll test to see whether psutils
So far, everything worked as expected. I only have Sarge in my
sources.list, of course amd64 is not yet on the main servers, but
besides this is pretty standard.
> builds okay on sarge. I have another bug related to libpaper which
> I'm planning on resolving tomorrow or over the weekend.
> > Unfortunately, I never used cdbs, so I am a little lost here. There
> It seems unlikely that this could have to do with cdbs.
Ok.
> > I am willing to assist you in finding this out if you tell me, what I
> > should check for (is there a way, to tell cdbs to run verbose?).=20
> > I also think the severity is too low, but before we
> > drive some horses crazy, we should look for the real cause :-))
> >
> > And yes, it build fine after installing libpaper-dev.
>=20
> cdbs is not responsible for resolving build dependencies, nor is
> dpkg-buildpackage. If you use something like debuild or
> dpkg-checkbuilddeps, that will check for proper build dependencies.
This is new to me. I always assumed (and in fact, it always worked
this way (always =3D since around the time Woody was released)).
> If the only problem is that you're running dpkg-buildpackage directly
> and it's failing because of libpaper-dev not being installed, then I
> believe there's no bug here but rather an innocent and understandable
> case of user error. :-) If this is the case, we can close this bug
> report, but if not, I can help you look further.
Well, dpkg-buildpackage still works as intended. But yes, it was my
error. I recently had to override a build-dependency (thus I used
"-d"). I simply re-used the old command. If I remove "-d" from the
command line, than dpkg-buildpackage happily complainis about missing
build-dependencies and aborts (tested on my package and psutils).=20
Thanks for your prompt reply!
Greetings
Helge
--=20
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.de
gpg signed mail preferred=20
64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreu=
tzm
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDffyNRsxcY/MYpWoRAmH8AKCb9uLN2q2ZE/wq95Dp24b33eDhBACfV773
MI5dcpWS5tVFmFYalwhVskI=
=G0fw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
