Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:18:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339933: signing-party: [caff] problem with a mailserver 
(but Gnus and Mozilla work)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2005 18:55:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 19 10:55:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [195.32.84.213] (helo=dione.pcaserver.net)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EdXs5-000803-4S
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 10:55:33 -0800
Received: (qmail 25114 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2005 19:55:25 +0100
Received: from 205.1.62.81.cust.bluewin.ch (HELO gismo.pca.it) (81.62.1.205)
  by monteverdivini.it with SMTP; 19 Nov 2005 19:55:25 +0100
Received: by gismo.pca.it (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 38629BFE6; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:54:51 +0100 (CET)
From: Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: signing-party: [caff] problem with a mailserver (but Gnus and Mozilla 
work)
X-Debbugs-CC: Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:54:48 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
        micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        RCVD_IN_SORBS,WEIRD_PORT,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: signing-party
Version: 0.4.4-2
Severity: important

Hello!

I met Martin F. Krafft (madduck) last week-end for a key-signing party
(well, we were only two :-( ).

Last Monday he and me signed our keys using caff and as I was at
university I used the university mailserver via postfix (I'm not
allowed to use my own mailserver, as port 25 is blocked).  And then
the problem...

BTW, I'm using No Gnus 0.4 on GNU Emacs snapshot and all the PGP
stuffs work well.=20

1) Every mail caff generated for each Martin's key was unusable: even
   on my bcc: copy, I'm asked if I want to decrypt the message, but
   then nothing happens.  Here how the mail looks inside:

   =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
   ------------=3D_1131976584-9445-9

   Content-Typ
   e: application/octet-stream; name=3D"msg.asc"
   Content-Disposition: inline; filenam
   e=3D"msg.asc"
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

   -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
   Version
   : GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

   hQIOAwLI9ujV8M7qEAf/SAx+ZakBkPhQWRfkeMPBKyJsb2tj7YWN
   ROqcTJX5t48k
   kl9wdHfWxZp477SWghy+C/kgxVpIrwuqMAVYDlwV9YIADdy0HE7M9mBPyrYzniwN
   LZ
   =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

2) For each key I've in my signature [1], only the mail to my
   University address (zoo.unige.ch) wasn't readable.  Again, I'm
   asked to decrypt the message, then asked for my PGP key's password
   and the message looks like the one I sent to Martin:

   =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
   -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
   Ver
   sion: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

   hQEOA64ryyXEqGQIEAP/fIcU5QoiSo9jmiUzEMxkX7pbPvZq
   mdHkEeAdql9T7IBz
   5geUZxHCZiipeccPavMtA2DMWQmSgeeMeqgGb+YJvlnF9ac4twMwwQGpYOvPE9u
   =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

The first thing I thought was a specific problem with the university
mailserver (i.e., it cannot manage encrypted mails).  So, I tried
sending encrypted mail to my University address using Mozilla Mail
2:1.7.12-1 + Enigmail 2:0.93-1 and No Gnus 0.4: both worked perfectly,
I mean, the mail was sent through the university mailserver and it was
readable.  Another test was to send an encrypted mail through a third
mailserver (the Switzerland Bluewin one) to my university address: I
could read the encrypted mail.  AFAIK, the problem should not be the
university mailserver.

Now, I'd like to keep my university address on my PGP key, but if the
next time I meet someone for a key-signing party I'll receive unusable
mails for the university signed key, well, that's won't be good.

Is there any way to locate the problem, I mean, is it a mailserver
problem or somewhere else?  If the problem isn't the university
mailserver, I guess it should be in libgnupg-interface-perl or in
libmime-perl, but I'm not a skilled Perl coder (and this is the main
reason I file this bug to signing-party).

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

[1] http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?search=3Dluca%40pca.it&op=3D=
vindex

=2D- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'ex=
perimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8)

Versions of packages signing-party depends on:
ii  gnupg            1.4.2-2                 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP=
 rep
ii  libgnupg-interfa 0.33-5                  Perl interface to GnuPG
ii  libmailtools-per 1.62-1                  Manipulate email in perl progr=
ams
ii  libmime-perl     5.418-1                 Perl5 modules for MIME-complia=
nt m
ii  libtext-template 1.44-1.1                Text::Template perl module
ii  mailx            1:8.1.2-0.20050715cvs-1 A simple mail user agent

Versions of packages signing-party recommends:
ii  dialog                    1.0-20051107-1 Displays user-friendly dialog =
boxe
ii  libpaper-utils            1.1.14-3       Library for handling paper cha=
ract
ii  libtext-iconv-perl        1.4-2          converts between character set=
s in
ii  postfix [mail-transport-a 2.2.4-1.0.1    A high-performance mail transp=
ort=20
ii  whiptail                  0.51.6-31      Displays user-friendly dialog =
boxe

=2D- no debconf information

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDf3T6VAp7Xm10JmkRAqwIAJ0c0N5Hse4PLmxEfaaVK0sYY3TujgCfcmnU
GdHTj8eceX7eKQX/aW5pBk8=
=jy4X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 339933-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2005 20:18:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 19 12:18:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from asteria.debian.or.at ([86.59.21.34] ident=postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EdZA6-0004uS-95; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:18:14 -0800
Received: by asteria.debian.or.at (Postfix, from userid 1002)
        id 8737470CD10; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:18:12 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:18:12 +0100
From: Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#339933: signing-party: [caff] problem with a mailserver (but 
Gnus and Mozilla work)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-PGP: 1024D/94C09C7F 5B00 C96D 5D54 AEE1 206B  AF84 DE7A AF6E 94C0 9C7F
X-Request-PGP: http://www.palfrader.org/keys/94C09C7F.asc
X-Accept-Language: de, en
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
        VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

severity 339933 normal
thanks

First of all, this is not of severity important.  Please stop this
severity inflation.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, Luca Capello wrote:

> 2) For each key I've in my signature [1], only the mail to my
>    University address (zoo.unige.ch) wasn't readable.

So I bet your university mail server breaks things.  I doubt there is
anything caff can do about this.

-- 
 PGP signed and encrypted  |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
    messages preferred.    | : :' :      The  universal
                           | `. `'      Operating System
 http://www.palfrader.org/ |   `-    http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to