Your message dated Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:31:53 +0100
with message-id <20140228213153.gf3...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#368243: packagessplit, new package apt-security-setup
has caused the Debian Bug report #368243,
regarding packagessplit, new package apt-security-setup
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
368243: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=368243
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-setup
Severity: wishlist
Hi
Here a short report from my mail to debian-boot, I am posting it as a
wishlist bug :)
<--snip-->
I wondered if it would be possible to outsource the security mirror
stuff (90 security) into an own package, maybe apt-mirror-setup*udeb ?
I guess this is also done with the apt-mirror-setup and apt-cdrom-setup
packages or?
<--snip-->
This would allow others to decide if they want to include this udeb into
the installation or not.
Short report why I would like to have it:
When the security mirror question is inputed the network is not yet
setup and therefore no mirror can be called. Anyway we are including the
security mirror later, so it would be nice to have the opportunity to
skip this part during the installation :)
Greetings
Steffen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> (2014-02-28):
> I'm not sure what the "security mirror question" means.
> apt-setup/security_host maybe? AFAICT the network is set up long before
> we hit apt-setup so I'm not sure I understand what you're requesting.
<wh...@apu.snow-crash.org>: Command died with status 127: "exec
/usr/bin/procmail". Command output: sh: 1: exec: /usr/bin/procmail: not
found
→ closing.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
