Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 07:22:52 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#726960: units: exit of value of units --version is non 0
has caused the Debian Bug report #726960,
regarding units: exit of value of units --version is non 0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
726960: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726960
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: units
Version: 1.88
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
the exit value of "units --version" is 3 instead of 0 (as should be for
success). Check the following:
$ units --version
GNU Units version 1.88
with readline, units database in /usr/share/misc/units.dat
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GNU Units comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
You may redistribute copies of GNU Units
under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
$ echo $?
3
I'm trying to use "units --version" in a script to check if units is installed
in the system when I faced with this problem. I found this quite non-standard.
I would expect it to return 0 .
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.2
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental'), (1, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: fixed units/2.10-1
Hi Carnë,
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:15:21 +0100, Carnë Draug <[email protected]>
wrote:
> the exit value of "units --version" is 3 instead of 0 (as should be for
> success). Check the following:
This is fixed in version 2.10.
Regards,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
