Your message dated Mon, 07 Apr 2014 19:03:53 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug #618890 - flightgear should depend on fgfs-aircraft-base
and fgfs-models-base
has caused the Debian Bug report #618890,
regarding flightgear should depend on fgfs-aircraft-base and fgfs-models-base
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
618890: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618890
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: flightgear
Version: 2.0.0-3
Severity: important
The flightgear package only recommends fgfs-aircraft-base and fgfs-models-base
packages.
Because of that, when one doesn't 'treat recommends as depends' the packages
are not installed.
The effect is that after running fgfs one gets the following errors.
1. If the fgfs-aircraft-base is missing, the fgfs displays this message in
console and quits immedietely:
Cannot find specified aircraft: c172p
Config option parsing failed ...
2. If the fgfs-models-base is missing, the fgfs starts to load and then quits
with a Segmentation Fault:
Failed to load file: "Models/Aircraft/marker.xml"
Segmentation Fault
Regards,
Tomek
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
the inter-dependencies between data packages got more and more
complicated. With flightgear-3.0, I had to punt and simply make
flightgear depend on flightgear-data-all. That in turn means this issue
is resolved.
I hope to eventually be able to relax dependencies between data
packages, again. However, that task seems out of scope of this bug report.
Regards
Markus Wanner
--- End Message ---
