Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:35:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in recent uploads of manpages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2005 18:44:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 05 11:44:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.56] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DpsOn-0002Wc-00; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 11:44:01 -0700
Received: from andromeda (cpe-69-202-136-66.twcny.res.rr.com [69.202.136.66] 
(may be forged))
        by ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
j65IhuIU023220
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 14:43:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1DpsOh-0006dC-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 14:43:55 -0400
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 14:43:45 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: manpages-dev: Difficult to understand in sscanf RETURN VALUE
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: manpages-dev
Severity: normal

I quote from the RETURN VALUE section of sscanf(3):

  The value EOF is returned if an input failure occurs before any
  conversion such as an end-of-file occurs.

This seems to imply that "end-of-file" is a "conversion", which I
think must be unintentional.  I suggest the following replacement
text (which is probably what is intended):

  The value EOF is returned if an input failure (such as end-of-file)
  occurs before any conversion is assigned.

Justin

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 317037-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Nov 2005 16:35:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 22 08:35:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.57])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Eeb7Q-0005wp-VB; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 08:35:45 -0800
Received: from andromeda (cpe-69-202-136-66.twcny.res.rr.com [69.202.136.66])
        by ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
jAMGZep4000353;
        Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:35:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 4.54)
        id 1Eeb7L-0004Nh-M7; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:35:39 -0500
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:35:39 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Kerrisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: fixed in recent uploads of manpages
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 16

Version: 2.09-1

These bugs are all reported fixed by the upstream manpages maintainer,
Michael Kerrisk.  For my own convenience, I'm marking them all as
"fixed by version 2.09-1", even though some of them are fixed by
earlier uploads.  The bug number, correct fixed-in version, and title
are listed below:

 #317037 2.06 Difficult to understand in sscanf RETURN VALUE
 #315411 2.09 New upstream release: 2.09
 #209323 2.09 please include pty(4) manpage
 #330877 2.09 read can return EINVAL when using O_DIRECT and buffer not aligned
 #321131 2.08 exit.3 missing &quot;is&quot;
 #299795 2.07 Some library functions' manpage use wrong hyphen
 #295666 2.03 regex.7.gz: The word boundary regexps are unsupported
 #326520 2.08 'man msgget' typo: one line not displayed
 #306517 2.04 epoll_ctl(2) description differs from implementation
 #291121 2.04 flock(2) second time by same process
 #323851 2.08 getpwnam.3 manpage should clarify the scope of pw_dir
 #323062 2.08 clone(2) CLONE_PARENT_SETTID description incorrect

 #101433 2.04 "man setitimer" give bad informations
 #113812 2.04 libc6-dev: iconv prototype
 #317037 2.06 Difficult to understand in sscanf RETURN VALUE
 #219695 2.04 sysconf(3): describes _SC_2_DEV, which doesn't exist
 #294890 2.03 Typo in wait(2): "watpid"

-- 
Clear skies,
Justin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to