Your message dated Sat, 26 Apr 2014 09:46:47 -0300
with message-id
<cap+dxjduryysgxgh8ohx+vupp4nwh5sqioa7apr0a_dvyhr...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#631440: file: Mistakes when showing dates from MS
Office docs
has caused the Debian Bug report #631440,
regarding buggy magic: mistakes dates from MS Office docs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
631440: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631440
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: file
Version: 5.04-5
Severity: normal
The file command can be used to show data about MS Office documents.
However, when showing data gotten from docs (e.g. MS Word 97 doc),
the file prints erroneous dates. It is undesirable in forensics
analysis.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Eriberto - Brazil
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.1
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages file depends on:
ii libc6 2.11.2-10 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii libmagic1 5.04-5 File type determination library us
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime
file recommends no packages.
file suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Sorry for my very long delay. I did a test with the current version
and the problem appears fixed. So I am closing this bug.
Thanks a lot for your attention.
Regards,
Eriberto
2014-02-27 17:06 GMT-03:00 Christoph Biedl <[email protected]>:
> Please provide more information. Which dates do you see, which ones do
> you expect? Just in case, Jan 1st 1601 is the "zero" time value in
> these documents, like Jan 1st 1970 in the *ix world.
--- End Message ---
