Your message dated Sat, 26 Nov 2005 06:02:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#262983: fixed in rsh-redone 78-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2004 14:53:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 02 07:53:32 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from westc.west.nl [192.43.210.66] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BreBw-0007xL-00; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 07:53:32 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by West.NL id i72EqxN29331;
        Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:52:59 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from appelscha( 192.43.210.169) by westc via smap (V2.0)
        id xma029328; Mon, 2 Aug 04 16:52:47 +0200
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:52:47 +0200 (CEST)
From: Arthur de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rsh-redone-client: rsh does not accept hostname -l username
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


Subject: rsh-redone-client: rsh does not accept hostname -l username
Package: rsh-redone-client
Version: 63-2
Severity: normal

When I do:
 rsh localhost -l arthur hostname
I get :
 -l: Command not found.

Since we have several scripts and people with habbits that rely on this
functionality this is a bug for us. I know the syntax should be options
before the hostname but most other rsh implementations (and also ssh)
allow this so this is really an incompatible difference.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-west-optiplex
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_GB

-- arthur de jong - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - west consulting b.v. --

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 262983-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2005 14:17:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 26 06:17:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Eg0d1-0006wk-BG; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 06:02:11 -0800
From: Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#262983: fixed in rsh-redone 78-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 06:02:11 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: rsh-redone
Source-Version: 78-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rsh-redone, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rsh-redone-client_78-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rsh-redone/rsh-redone-client_78-1_i386.deb
rsh-redone-server_78-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rsh-redone/rsh-redone-server_78-1_i386.deb
rsh-redone_78-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rsh-redone/rsh-redone_78-1.diff.gz
rsh-redone_78-1.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rsh-redone/rsh-redone_78-1.dsc
rsh-redone_78.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/r/rsh-redone/rsh-redone_78.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rsh-redone package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:48:35 +0100
Source: rsh-redone
Binary: rsh-redone-client rsh-redone-server
Architecture: source i386
Version: 78-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 rsh-redone-client - Reimplementation of rsh and rlogin
 rsh-redone-server - Reimplementation of rshd and rlogind
Closes: 198840 211301 262983
Changes: 
 rsh-redone (78-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release. Closes: #198840, #211301, #262983.
Files: 
 21f65f177bf6cdfc89d80dad22c7b8d8 600 net optional rsh-redone_78-1.dsc
 096a70b6ea5d88bdadff1198aaeeaf71 17044 net optional rsh-redone_78.orig.tar.gz
 dad9f2fcc6d6bb3580ef0f3d5a0a7e50 2615 net optional rsh-redone_78-1.diff.gz
 786360b9268b51e7e5f718f1c14c9953 14380 net optional 
rsh-redone-server_78-1_i386.deb
 bb9b75fa77a6c66fb2c15d3ac85dfdb2 14566 net optional 
rsh-redone-client_78-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDiGgwAxLow12M2nsRAk8+AKCTG1lnl0u5JNAGZ300Di5l99Uo6ACdExly
YhN6zS1oKn7JSoQgscAJLS4=
=uKeN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to