Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:28:37 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ftp.d.o: please remove binary package bigloo-backend-jvm on
ia64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2005 20:16:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 01 12:16:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.29]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EX2YX-0003Dt-00; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 12:16:29 -0800
Received: from nan92-1-81-57-214-146 (nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net
[81.57.214.146])
by smtp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A44737529;
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 21:16:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dwitch by nan92-1-81-57-214-146 with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EX2Yj-00080u-H3; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 21:16:41 +0100
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 21:16:41 +0100
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ftp.d.o: please remove binary package bigloo-backend-jvm on ia64
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
bigloo-backend-jvm is not built any more on ia64 since sablevm is
buggy (bug just reported, did not get a bugid yet).
Please remove the current binary package from the archive (only
appeared in unstable) so that it does not block migration to testing.
TIA
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.31-k6
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=french (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
| Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 336923-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2005 00:28:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 28 16:28:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl ([131.211.39.72])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EgtMM-0000wR-Bz
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:28:38 -0800
Received: from 22pc220.sshunet.nl ([145.97.220.22] helo=bla.wolffelaar.nl)
by a-eskwadraat.nl with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1EgtML-0007e8-Dn; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:28:37 +0100
Received: from jeroen by bla.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EgtML-00009n-5o; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:28:37 +0100
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:28:37 +0100
To: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ftp.d.o: please remove binary package bigloo-backend-jvm on ia64
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 11:46:39PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 08:23:43PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:16:41PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> > > bigloo-backend-jvm is not built any more on ia64 since sablevm is
> > > buggy (bug just reported, did not get a bugid yet).
>
> For the record, it is #336918
Which is meanwhile fixed, and I see bigloo is uptodate on ia64.
I'm assuming this removal is therefore no longer needed, please reopen if
I'm wrong.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
