Your message dated Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:58:52 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #280217 is fixed in gmailfs 0.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 2004 07:11:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 07 23:11:25 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CR3gS-0001vB-00; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 23:11:24 -0800
Received: from localhost (albatross.madduck.net [127.0.0.1])
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id CF525897796
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:11:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (lapse.madduck.net [130.60.75.59])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "cirrus.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified OK))
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 7993889777F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:11:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8529F200AF7; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:11:23 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:11:23 +0100
From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: please add transparent encryption
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.99.5
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 kernel 2.6.8-cirrus i686
X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'
X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please spare me
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: gmailfs
Severity: wishlist
I want transparent encryption on a per-file basis for gmailfs.=20
08:07 < madduck> Seb: what we need now is some form of encryption so that=
=20
google cannot parse the contents of what we store on a=20
gmailfs.
08:07 < madduck> that would be cool!
08:07 < Seb> yep, I feel we need that too. I don't have *any* trust in the=
=20
good people of Google :>
08:08 < madduck> well, i don't think cryptfs is going to do it...
08:08 < madduck> rather, gmailfs needs a hook for a filter on file content =
up=20
and download
08:08 < Seb> yeah, precisely
08:08 < madduck> and then simply encrypt the files symmetrically on upload =
and=20
decrypt them on download
08:08 < madduck> all transparently.
08:08 < Seb> file a bug on gmailfs ;)
08:08 < madduck> fine
08:08 < Seb> heh
08:09 < trave11er> ...and probably violate the user agreement
08:09 < lifeless> does gmailfs emulate a block device at all?
08:09 < madduck> lifeless: no
08:09 < madduck> trave11er: whatever... :)
08:09 < lifeless> maybe that would be the easiest approach :)
08:09 < madduck> bug about to be filed. last call for comments...
08:09 < madduck> lifeless: agreed.
08:10 < lifeless> then just layer cryptofs + md or whatever on top :)
08:10 < madduck> lifeless: won't work because then you will be transferring=
=20
the whole filesystem back and forth on every write.
08:10 < lifeless> madduck: 'wont work efficiently'
08:10 < Seb> madduck: you file faster than you speak, man :)
08:10 < lifeless> not 'wont work;
--=20
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBjxwbIgvIgzMMSnURAtJPAJ9SdHPLpXo37KQvyToaHvXjeo6ITQCgqX+5
UyA+6FPEJpowuDpk8+UDzGg=
=c4Z9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 280217-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2005 00:59:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 28 16:59:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.20] helo=mail.gmx.net)
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Egtpl-0002D8-Sa
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:59:02 -0800
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2005 00:58:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (EHLO localhost) [70.132.28.71]
by mail.gmx.net (mp023) with SMTP; 29 Nov 2005 01:58:30 +0100
X-Authenticated: #18275278
Received: from foo.befour.org ([10.0.0.6])
by localhost with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 )
id 1EgtpD-0002TQ-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:58:27 -0800
Received: from seb by foo.befour.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Egtpc-0006p8-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:58:52 -0800
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:58:52 -0800
From: Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: #280217 is fixed in gmailfs 0.6-1
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: Seb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
gmailfs (0.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version, including password prompt and transparent
encryption support (Closes: #321710, #280217).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
