Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 07:10:25 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341389: uniq no longer accepts separator specification
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2005 11:49:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 30 03:49:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fisica.ufpr.br ([200.17.209.129])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EhQT5-0002Xi-Us
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:49:48 -0800
Received: by fisica.ufpr.br (Postfix)
id 2BFF61BA42F; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:49:45 -0200 (BRDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:49:43 -0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: uniq no longer accepts separator specification
X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Carlos Carvalho)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: coreutils
Version: 5.93-5
uniq no longer has the option -t to specify the field separator. This
breaks compatibility with previous versions and is inconsistent with
other programs in the same package, like sort.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 341389-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2005 12:10:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 30 04:10:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vms048pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.48])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EhQn2-0000NK-RI
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 04:10:24 -0800
Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([70.108.123.101])
by vms048.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep
9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 06:10:24 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72CF16005DD; Wed,
30 Nov 2005 07:10:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from osgiliath.mathom.us ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (osgiliath [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 14279-02-3; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 07:10:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: by osgiliath.mathom.us (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 59B0E60018E; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 07:10:25 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 07:10:25 -0500
From: Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#341389: uniq no longer accepts separator specification
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Carlos Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-disposition: inline
X-Pgp-Fingerprint: 53 FF 38 00 E7 DD 0A 9C 84 52 84 C5 EE DF 7C 88
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at mathom.us
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:49:43AM -0200, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
>uniq no longer has the option -t to specify the field separator. This
>breaks compatibility with previous versions and is inconsistent with
>other programs in the same package, like sort.
The option was never accepted upstream and has always been a
non-standard extension. Previous releases warned against using it in
README.Debian. It's been dropped intentionally.
Mike Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
