Your message dated Sat, 9 Aug 2014 11:40:14 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line kernel timestamp overload
has caused the Debian Bug report #187660,
regarding kernel timestamp overload
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
187660: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=187660
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linuxlogo
Version: 4.05-1
Severity: wishlist
In here:
> .2Z` ]X[. xY| ]oZ( Linux Version 2.4.21-pre4
> .2#; )3k; _s!~ jXf` Compiled #1 Mon Feb 24 05:29:02 GMT 2003
or here:
> .2Z` ]X[. xY| ]oZ( Linux Version 2.4.20
> .2#; )3k; _s!~ jXf` Compiled #1 SMP Fri Nov 29 02:15:39 MST 2002
it seems like there's distracting and uninformative information. I'd
say that the "Compiled #1 SMP Fri Nov 29 02:15:39 MST 2002" could be
stripped down to its essentials; the "SMP" seems like it belongs after
the linux version (in parens) on the prev line; the "#1" could go; the
day of the week could go; the time should be converted and displayed
in the local timezone; and the seconds field doesn't seem critical.
(Really, when you sit down at a machine it is not clear to me that the
time of kernel compilation is of particular interest. Maybe something
more informative, like last console user id & logout time, or load
factor, might be more fun. But I digress.)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 5.10
I believe this does not occur anymore in version 5.10.
--
Dariusz Dwornikowski,
Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology
www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/
room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41
--- End Message ---
