Your message dated Fri, 2 Dec 2005 17:23:47 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341688: r-bioc-repostools: MIAME load function is missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2005 09:39:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 02 01:39:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from raffaello.crs4.it ([156.148.72.33])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ei7O9-0000Ry-Ge
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 01:39:34 -0800
Received: from hugin.crs4.it (hugin.crs4.it [156.148.71.67])
by raffaello.crs4.it (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 1DAD76BC33; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:38:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sparre by hugin.crs4.it with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1Ei7NU-0005GQ-OG; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 10:38:52 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jacob Sparre Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: r-bioc-repostools: MIAME load function is missing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 10:38:52 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: r-bioc-repostools
Version: 1.8.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Would it be possible to include the BioC function for loading MIAME
data files in the package?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-powerpc
Locale: LANG=fo_FO.ISO8859-1, LC_CTYPE=fo_FO.ISO8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages r-bioc-repostools depends on:
ii r-base-core 2.2.0.final-4 GNU R core of statistical computin
r-bioc-repostools recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 341688-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2005 16:23:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 02 08:23:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from www.sslug.dk ([130.228.2.150] helo=sslug.dk)
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EiDhN-0006Z5-EV
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 08:23:49 -0800
Received: (qmail 18989 invoked by uid 5196); 2 Dec 2005 16:23:47 -0000
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by localhost with SMTP; 2 Dec 2005 16:23:47 -0000
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 17:23:47 +0100 (CET)
From: Jacob Sparre Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Steffen_M=F6ller?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#341688: r-bioc-repostools: MIAME load function is missing
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> > Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > > Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> Ok, then the bug report is somewhat misleading as you are
> really requesting a change in reposTools, but rather that
> Biobase be packaged as well, right?
Right. - But I hadn't figured that out yet, when I reported
this wish.
> I think we both want to be able to say 'apt-get install
> r-bioc-biobase' and do the same for all other BioC
> packages.
Exactly.
> But resources are finite, and we do not have package
> maintainers for all these packages. The Alioth project is
> an attempt at automating this, but it isn't there yet.
Ahh. That sounds like it would be worthwhile to put a bit
of time into.
> > PS: How do I uninstall a package installed with a R
> > installation script?
>
> What is an R installation script?
For example:
source("http://www.bioconductor.org/biocLite.R";)
biocLite()
It's some R code, which installs some packages.
Unfortunately I can't find a log of what it has installed.
> You mean 'R CMD INSTALL foo'?
No.
> That has a matching REMOVE, I believe. 'rm -r' also works
> :)
I'm sure `rm -r` works, but I really prefer `aptitude remove
<package>`. `rm -rf /usr/local/lib/R` seems like it does
the job.
Thanks,
Jacob
--
"There are only two types of data:
Data which has been backed up
Data which has not been lost - yet"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
