Your message dated Fri, 02 Dec 2005 13:48:05 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#338383: fixed in util-vserver 0.30.209-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2005 23:31:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 09 15:31:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.115] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EZzPW-0007Cf-00; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:31:22 -0800
Received: from angua.pieni.net (ip212-226-168-226.adsl.kpnqwest.fi 
[212.226.168.226])
        by gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B76DFD9EA
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:31:19 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [10.10.100.16] (unknown [10.10.100.16])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by angua.pieni.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227B76A685
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:31:19 +0200 (EET)
Subject: util-vserver: doesn't uninstall cleanly
From: Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian bugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:30:12 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: util-vserver
Version: 0.30.204-5sarge2

Testing util-vserver with piuparts, I find that it does not uninstall
cleanly:

0m5.6s ERROR: Package purging left files on system:
  /etc/vservers
    owned by: util-vserver
  /etc/vservers/.defaults
    owned by: util-vserver
  /etc/vservers/.defaults/run.rev
  /etc/vservers/.defaults/vdirbase

The postinst script creates run.rev and vdirbase, but there is nothing
to remove them when the package is purged, so they are left on the
filesystem as cruft.

-- 
I am an artist. Source code is my canvas, a programming language is my
paint.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 338383-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2005 21:51:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 02 13:51:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EiIlB-0002Gz-TQ; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 13:48:05 -0800
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#338383: fixed in util-vserver 0.30.209-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 13:48:05 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: util-vserver
Source-Version: 0.30.209-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
util-vserver, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

util-vserver_0.30.209-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/u/util-vserver/util-vserver_0.30.209-1.diff.gz
util-vserver_0.30.209-1.dsc
  to pool/main/u/util-vserver/util-vserver_0.30.209-1.dsc
util-vserver_0.30.209-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/u/util-vserver/util-vserver_0.30.209-1_i386.deb
util-vserver_0.30.209.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/u/util-vserver/util-vserver_0.30.209.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated util-vserver package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  2 Dec 2005 17:26:39 +0100
Source: util-vserver
Binary: util-vserver
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.30.209-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 util-vserver - tools for Virtual private servers and context switching
Closes: 329090 330529 338383
Changes: 
 util-vserver (0.30.209-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release.
     This fix a vserver escape problem on 2.4 kernel, closes: #329090.
   * Documented that xattrs is needed as a mount option on reiserfs,
     closes: #330529.
   * Remove two files on purge, closes: #338383.
Files: 
 626249ac2bef031d5e9b32efd2d3e89f 771 net optional util-vserver_0.30.209-1.dsc
 5721a959ddcd180e60e4829b5db15e99 769763 net optional 
util-vserver_0.30.209.orig.tar.gz
 081a879b366b59994f462a7799ba0990 162387 net optional 
util-vserver_0.30.209-1.diff.gz
 aedd0b22b9096677e496ea9a2dd4ca71 396778 net optional 
util-vserver_0.30.209-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDkL4vGKGxzw/lPdkRAsYkAJ9TGXPImKTclPz8zpkVgtcBZUD8vQCdHCqt
3ZTGkkjCJDbmFmhh0Lm34co=
=iJxC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to