Your message dated Sat, 03 Dec 2005 09:37:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341771: debconf: errors during upgrade
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2005 22:37:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 02 14:37:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from psmtp03.wxs.nl ([195.121.247.12])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EiJXP-0005HT-8t
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 14:37:55 -0800
Received: from strider.fjphome.nl (ip545593b6.speed.planet.nl [84.85.147.182])
by psmtp03.wxs.nl
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.07 (built Jun 24 2005))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri,
02 Dec 2005 23:37:24 +0100 (MET)
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 23:37:01 +0100
From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debconf: errors during upgrade
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=nextPart1800518.L03aqMbNsa
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--nextPart1800518.L03aqMbNsa
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: debconf
Version: 1.4.59
Severity: important
During an upgrade to 1.4.59 on s/390 (hercules), I noticed the following=20
messages on my terminal.
Setting up debconf (1.4.59) ...
X Error: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter) 3
Major opcode: 20
Minor opcode: 0
Resource id: 0x3000373
(Reading database ... 39055 files and directories currently installed.)
All lines starting from "X Error..." had only a line feed but no carriage=20
return and thus did not start at the beginning of a new line.
Cheers,
=46JP
--nextPart1800518.L03aqMbNsa
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDkMyhgm/Kwh6ICoQRAo5WAJ9HwHa6/9/GebbMgg0ig8I9fVBM4QCfcroZ
gutcBHmo0W0nVeGm8JigOyU=
=SXQA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1800518.L03aqMbNsa--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 341771-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2005 08:41:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 03 00:41:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from psmtp02.wxs.nl ([195.121.247.11])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EiSu3-0005ET-IR
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 00:37:55 -0800
Received: from strider.fjphome.nl (ip545593b6.speed.planet.nl [84.85.147.182])
by psmtp02.wxs.nl
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21 2004))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Sat, 03 Dec 2005 09:37:24 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 09:37:23 +0100
From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#341771: debconf: errors during upgrade
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Saturday 03 December 2005 01:27, you wrote:
> Looks more like an unrelated X app that was run from that console an
> happened to output X errors right then than debconf.
Hmm. /me wonders how that got into a terminal running the ssh session into
hercules S/390...
But yes, looks like it. Sorry for the noise. Closing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
