Your message dated Tue, 2 Sep 2014 19:17:41 +0200
with message-id
<cajgook_8neqvcccr1e9powdaxoymyovobgwergw8c0c-8x4...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: might be worth "experimental"ing 1.5.0-alpha1 release (Feb
2013)
has caused the Debian Bug report #708538,
regarding might be worth "experimental"ing 1.5.0-alpha1 release (Feb 2013)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
708538: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708538
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: s3cmd
Version: 1.1.0~beta3-1
Severity: wishlist
subj
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental'), (100,
'stable'), (100, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages s3cmd depends on:
ii python 2.7.3-13
s3cmd recommends no packages.
s3cmd suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
1.5.0-rc1 is in archive, closing this bug.
Best regards,
Mikhail Gusarov.
--- End Message ---
