Your message dated Fri, 05 Sep 2014 19:46:59 -0700
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line reported in error
has caused the Debian Bug report #760612,
regarding smplayer: error 127, libdvdnavmini.so.4 missing when opening media URL
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
760612: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760612
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: smplayer
Version: 14.3.0-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
In current Testing, /usr/lib/libdvdnavmini.so.4 is not part of package
libdvdnav4:
$ dpkg -L libdvdnav4
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/lintian
/usr/share/lintian/overrides
/usr/share/lintian/overrides/libdvdnav4
/usr/share/bug
/usr/share/bug/libdvdnav4
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/libdvdnav4
/usr/share/doc/libdvdnav4/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/doc/libdvdnav4/changelog.gz
/usr/share/doc/libdvdnav4/copyright
/usr/share/doc/libdvdnav4/README
/usr/share/doc/libdvdnav4/AUTHORS
/usr/lib
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdvdnav.so.4.1.2
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdvdnav.so.4
This results in the following error when opening a media URL in smplayer:
/usr/bin/mplayer -noquiet -nofs -nomouseinput -sub-fuzziness 1 -identify -slave
-vo xv, -nokeepaspect -nodr -double -input conf=/usr/share/smplayer/input.conf
-stop-xscreensaver -wid 54525985 -monitorpixelaspect 1 -ass -embeddedfonts
-ass-line-spacing 0 -ass-font-scale 1 -noflip-hebrew -ass-styles
/home/andyman/.config/smplayer/styles.ass -subfont-autoscale 0 -subfont-osd-
scale 20 -subfont-text-scale 20 -subcp ISO-8859-1 -subpos 100 -cache 2048
-osdlevel 0 -prefer-ipv4 -vf-add screenshot -noslices -channels 2 -af
equalizer=0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 -softvol -softvol-max 110
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/13659436
/usr/bin/mplayer: error while loading shared libraries: libdvdnavmini.so.4:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Since the dependency on libdvdnav4 is from package mplayer and not package
smplayer, this may not be an smplayer bug- but I'm reporting on smplayer in
case smplayer is somehow responsible for needing a DVD-related library to read
non-DVD-based media.
apt-cache depends mplayer|grep dvd
Depends: libdvdnav4
Depends: libdvdread4
It looks like libdvdnavmini is not provided by *any* package in Testing:
https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=libdvdnavmini&mode=exactfilename&suite=testing&arch=any
Thanks for all you do, and I apologize if I've done this report wrong.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'),
(500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages smplayer depends on:
ii libc6 2.19-10
ii libgcc1 1:4.9.1-4
ii libqt4-network 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-1
ii libqt4-script 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-1
ii libqt4-xml 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-1
ii libqtcore4 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-1
ii libqtgui4 4:4.8.6+git64-g5dc8b2b+dfsg-1
ii libstdc++6 4.9.1-4
ii mplayer 2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1+svn34540-1+b2
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1
Versions of packages smplayer recommends:
pn smplayer-l10n <none>
pn smplayer-themes <none>
smplayer suggests no packages.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Original bug report was erroneous; I had forgotten to check for new
version of libdvdnav4 and mplayer (now upgraded to mplayer2 after
dist-upgrade.)
Reported behavior no longer occurs. Now I have a *different* bug ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUCnWOAAoJEAa852fG4/6BNtwH/2M+xBmXfZFDdr8KsAWsyeWp
dyCGLK1404WtpKU4LAl9Xn8xprZ6UCcRJw/khWVLgqv4uFu7SLSbnZxzWFQpKJNV
s2nc5ansvbJsa9xolqZ4sTKNYPTgPVBnOp7JAJDDm4qdblmJavNVnjN+ePxqMIuU
+D1DRMbG9Kwlx9o6sksPnJPXOo8W/bLMdmdFZdJ/ivZ9mJrlb1B0JPeFsK71wF/m
GUguAXuy53gsV4x+RLVYTckD7gVqfJFNV4Qy6+9uR80XqHFfjAKYTbT1US2SkThh
q3YUzY68wE2m3H6wh++SuNHkAUwVrx5FAiw1AUDsOnIznNm4XWov7rDWxu+Hb8Y=
=yulG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
