Your message dated Sun, 4 Dec 2005 15:34:37 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322650: ppp not setting PPP_IPARAM to IPARAM value from
connection config
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 01:24:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 11 18:24:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail28.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.133.169]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E3OI6-0007G5-00; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:24:58 -0700
Received: from optushome.com.au (c211-28-212-84.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au
[211.28.212.84])
by mail28.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
j7C1OtpS015428
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:24:56 +1000
Received: by optushome.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DC0D5EC00D; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:24:44 +1000 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Gordon Heydon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ppp not setting PPP_IPARAM to IPARAM value from connection config
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:24:44 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: ppp
Version: 2.4.3-20050321+2
Severity: important
PPP_IPARAM is being set to the ip address of the remote machine and not the
value which is set by the IPARAM parameter.
This is important to me as it allows me to work out the difference between
inbound and outbound connections.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.30
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages ppp depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libpam-modules 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules f
ii libpam-runtime 0.76-22 Runtime support for the PAM librar
ii libpam0g 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii libpcap0.7 0.7.2-7 System interface for user-level pa
ii makedev 2.3.1-78 creates device files in /dev
ii netbase 4.21 Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii procps 1:3.2.5-1 /proc file system utilities
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime
ppp recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 322650-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2005 14:34:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 04 06:34:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from attila.bofh.it ([213.92.8.2])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Eiuwy-0002kj-Hr
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 06:34:48 -0800
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 3D0585F77F; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 15:34:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 9917F1CE49; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 15:34:37 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 15:34:37 +0100
To: Gordon Heydon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#322650: ppp not setting PPP_IPARAM to IPARAM value from
connection config
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Nov 13, Gordon Heydon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes this is the case as I had to rewrite all my connection scripts so
> that I could work out which was an incomming and which is out going.
I double checked the code and tested ipparam on my system: I cannot
reproduce this bug, and considering the trivial nature of this code I do
not believe that in different conditions you could get a different
behaviour.
My conclusion is that your shell scripts are wrong in some way.
See for yourself:
echo "=3D=3D=3D $0 $@ =3D=3D=3D"
--=20
ciao,
Marco
--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDkv59FGfw2OHuP7ERAjPIAJ4vVH4s8ujIyknixL8jyN/B7jplIwCePq00
h+HzXOp7rskwqNgvhBXzZqE=
=vu/u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
