Your message dated Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:25:34 -0300
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#760952: ruby2.1: rdoc does not handle jquery.js anymore
has caused the Debian Bug report #760952,
regarding ruby2.1: rdoc does not handle jquery.js anymore
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
760952: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760952
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ruby2.1
Version: 2.1.2-4
Severity: important
Control: block 760909 with -1
Coin,
Between may, and probably since Ruby 2.1 took over 2.0, something
changes in the rdoc behavior. In the past 'rdoc/js/jquery.js' was
created, and i removed and replaced it with a symlink to avoid
shipping copies (with a dependency on libjs-jquery in the -doc
package). Someone rebuilded ruby-builder recently and discovered a
FTBFS (see #760909).
As this change probably makes several packages FTBFS, and as the
proper symlink to the JS file is not created either, this feels like a
regression to me. There's no reason a generated rdoc directory is not
usable directly by pointing a browser into it (packaged or not), but
it currently fails because it cannot find the 'jquery.js' file. So i'd
like your opinion on this before acting on my affected packages.
Regards.
--
Marc Dequènes (Duck)
pgpslnRlUe1tv.pgp
Description: PGP Digital Signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello Marc,
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:17:10PM +0200, Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote:
> Package: ruby2.1
> Version: 2.1.2-4
> Severity: important
> Control: block 760909 with -1
>
>
> Coin,
>
> Between may, and probably since Ruby 2.1 took over 2.0, something changes in
> the rdoc behavior. In the past 'rdoc/js/jquery.js' was created, and i
> removed and replaced it with a symlink to avoid shipping copies (with a
> dependency on libjs-jquery in the -doc package). Someone rebuilded
> ruby-builder recently and discovered a FTBFS (see #760909).
>
> As this change probably makes several packages FTBFS, and as the proper
> symlink to the JS file is not created either, this feels like a regression
> to me. There's no reason a generated rdoc directory is not usable directly
> by pointing a browser into it (packaged or not), but it currently fails
> because it cannot find the 'jquery.js' file. So i'd like your opinion on
> this before acting on my affected packages.
What changed is that libjs-jquery was moved to Recommends: and
recommended packages are not installed by buildds.
There are good reasons to not force libjs-jquery when installing Ruby
ith recommends disabled, so I am not keen on revisiting that decision.
I think the right fix in this case is to make ruby-builder build-depend
on libjs-jquery, _or_ just remove the `rm` call from debian/rules.
--
Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
