Your message dated Mon, 05 Dec 2005 21:37:38 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342146: binutils: Fails compiling Linux 2.6.9/i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Dec 2005 20:11:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 05 12:11:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from imf03aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.51])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EjMfa-0005ZF-Rc
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:10:43 -0800
Received: from ibm68aec.bellsouth.net ([70.149.118.80])
by imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 15:03:33 -0500
Received: from localhost ([70.149.118.80]) by ibm68aec.bellsouth.net
with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Mon, 5 Dec 2005 15:03:32 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Meybohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: binutils: Fails compiling Linux 2.6.9/i386
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 15:03:29 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Package: binutils
Version: 2.16.1cvs20051117-1
Severity: normal
The latest version of binutils fails compiling Linux 2.6.9 on the file
arch/i386/kernel/process.c:
$ head -n 4 Makefile
VERSION = 2
PATCHLEVEL = 6
SUBLEVEL = 9
EXTRAVERSION =
$ make arch/i386/kernel/process.o
CC arch/i386/kernel/process.o
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:772: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:773: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:966: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:967: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:1067: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:1068: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:1164: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:1165: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:1242: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:1254: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
make[1]: *** [arch/i386/kernel/process.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/i386/kernel/process.o] Error 2
This failure happens on multiple versions of gcc (3.4, 3.3, 2.95). The
version of binutils in testing currently (2.16.1-2) works, though.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages binutils depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.5-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
binutils recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 342146-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Dec 2005 21:38:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 05 13:38:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 83-216-156-21.jamest747.adsl.metronet.co.uk ([83.216.156.21]
helo=pasta.gloaming.local)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EjO2D-0003kj-NT
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:38:10 -0800
Received: from james by pasta.gloaming.local with local (Exim 4.52 #1 (Debian))
id 1EjO1i-0004cl-BO
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 21:37:38 +0000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#342146: binutils: Fails compiling Linux 2.6.9/i386
Mail-Copies-To: never
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 21:37:38 +0000
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (David Meybohm's message of "Mon, 05 Dec 2005
15:03:29 -0500")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
David Meybohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: binutils
> Version: 2.16.1cvs20051117-1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> The latest version of binutils fails compiling Linux 2.6.9 on the file
> arch/i386/kernel/process.c:
This is a kernel bug and is fixed in newer kernels.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
