Your message dated Mon, 05 Dec 2005 19:39:07 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341920: postinst fails and 'make-kpkg clean' doesn't
remove debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2005 06:49:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 03 22:49:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from caliban.lbl.gov ([128.3.11.38] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Eingg-00034i-8g
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:49:30 -0800
Received: from caliban.lbl.gov ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by caliban.lbl.gov (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id
jB46nTIl004997;
Sat, 3 Dec 2005 22:49:29 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by caliban.lbl.gov (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jB46nTeq004994;
Sat, 3 Dec 2005 22:49:29 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alex Romosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:
=?iso-8859-15?q?postinst_fails_and_=27make-kpkg_clean=27_doesn=27t_remove?=
=?iso-8859-15?q?_debian=0D=0Adirectory?=
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:49:29 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: kernel-package
Version: 10.012
Severity: important
trying to install the latest kernel package i get
Selecting previously deselected package linux-image-2.6.15-rc5.
(Reading database ... 110420 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking linux-image-2.6.15-rc5 (from
linux-image-2.6.15-rc5_2.6.15-rc5-1_i386.deb) ...
Setting up linux-image-2.6.15-rc5 (2.6.15-rc5-1) ...
dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6.15-rc5 (--install):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 128
Errors were encountered while processing:
linux-image-2.6.15-rc5
also running 'make-kpkg clean' doesn't remove the debian directory as it
used to (so i have to remove it manually).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-rc4
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages kernel-package depends on:
ii dpkg 1.13.11.0.1 package maintenance system for Deb
ii dpkg-dev 1.13.11 package building tools for Debian
ii file 4.15-2 Determines file type using "magic"
ii gcc [c-compiler] 4:4.0.2-1 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-3.3 [c-compiler] 1:3.3.6-10 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-3.4 [c-compiler] 3.4.5-1 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-4.0 [c-compiler] 4.0.2-5 The GNU C compiler
ii gettext 0.14.5-2 GNU Internationalization utilities
ii make 3.80-11 The GNU version of the "make" util
ii perl 5.8.7-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii po-debconf 0.9.0 manage translated Debconf template
Versions of packages kernel-package recommends:
ii bzip2 1.0.2-11 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Development Librari
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 341920-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 2005 01:47:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 05 17:47:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host-12-107-230-171.dtccom.net ([12.107.230.171]
helo=glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EjRv5-0007pi-JD
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 17:47:09 -0800
Received: from glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
[127.0.0.1])
by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with
ESMTP id jB61dF2O029462
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:39:17 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id
jB61d7Wv029457;
Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:39:07 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com: srivasta set
sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Alex Romosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#341920: postinst fails and 'make-kpkg clean' doesn't remove
debian
Organization: The Debian Project
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
(i486-pc-linux-gnu)
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACYAAAAwCAMAAABKbPgaAAAAM1BMVEUAAADIjH/0rp1KPz79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X-URL: http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Hashcash: 1:25:051206:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]::ErAskC9qDxfMND22:00000000000000000000000000000000000001Gx4F
X-Hashcash: 1:25:051206:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]::JocT1YsBAkMx6tPF:000000000000000000000000000000000000001b4ML
X-Face: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/;Y^gTjR\T^"B'fbeuVGiyKrvbfKJl!^e|e:iu(kJ6c|QYB57LP*|t
&YlP~HF/=h:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:6Cj0kd#4]>*D,|0djf'CVlXkI,>aV4\}?d_KEqsN{Nnt7
78"OsbQ["56/!nisvyB/uA5Q.{)gm6?q.j71ww.>b9b]-sG8zNt%KkIa>xWg&1VcjZk[hBQ>]j~`Wq
Xl,y1a!(>6`UM{~'X[Y_,Bv+}=L\SS*mA8=s;!=O`ja|@PEzb&i0}Qp,`Z\:6:OmRi*
X-Hashcash: 1:25:051206:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]::7ugERfdtAohh3uaY:0000000000000000000000000000000000Z9dP
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 19:39:07 -0600
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Alex Romosan's message of "Mon,
05 Dec 2005 16:48:45 -0800")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-CRM114-Score: -25.5787
X-CRM114-Status: Good ( pR: -25.5787 )
X-SA-Orig: -8.399, -25.5787
X-Spam-Value: -14.2644833333333
X-Grey: White
X-SA-Rep: -14.2644833333333 ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,HASHCASH_25
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang version 2.53 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
on 192.168.1.10
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Version: 10.015
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 16:48:45 -0800, Alex Romosan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Well, with 10.015 (currently in http://incoming.debian.org/) I have
>> gone back to the time tested debugging tool, the print
>> statement. Could you try with 10.015, and see if we can discover
>> what was going wrong?
> whatever changes happened between 10.011 and 10.015 seem to have
> solved the problem and postint doesn't crash anymore. the bug can
> probably be closed now. thanks.
Ah, it might have been removing the print statements that were
spewing informational messages tro STDOUT (which tends to mess up
debconf -- perhaps the postinst was trying to create an informational
debconf note).
manoj
--
Do not underestimate the power of the Force.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
