Your message dated Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:48:18 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#763912:
has caused the Debian Bug report #763912,
regarding libmlt6: loudness filter uses needlessly complicated data format
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
763912: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763912
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libmlt6
Version: 0.9.2-2
Severity: wishlist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
The "results" argument to the loudness filter embeds tabs, and therefore
close to impossible to use e.g. on a commandline with melt (but probably
cumbersome in other interfaces as well).
What seems obvious to me would be three arguments "loudness" "range" and
"peak", which would be ignored (or the filter fail loudly?) if not all
provided, and "results" either dropped or only applied as a legacy
fallback (or the filter fail loudly if both forms was provided?).
- Jonas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=
=VTBV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tags #763912 + wontfix upstream
thanks
Am 08.10.2014 um 20:55 schrieb Dan Dennedy:
It was obviously done this way for a reason. Won't fix. Anything
"wishful" should be accompanied by a patch or donation offer.
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/
E-Mail: [email protected]
[email protected]
*/
--- End Message ---
