Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:10:58 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line rgrep.1 fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2003 20:06:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 05 15:06:21 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gw.lsli.com [66.47.58.90] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19vMqa-0003wu-00; Fri, 05 Sep 2003 15:06:20 -0500
Received: by gw.lsli.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
        id 680E440F6; Fri,  5 Sep 2003 15:13:28 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by gw via smwrap Version 5.1.0devel
         id smwrapcHbZwn; Fri Sep  5 15:12:52 2003
From: Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: grep: man page for rgrep is doesn't match
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 15:05:42 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: grep
Version: 2.4.2-3
Severity: normal

'man rgrep' returns the manpage for grep, in which the string 'rgrep'
does not appear. One might guess that it's the same as 'grep -r', but
who knows?

It probably ought to be listed with the other variants in the second
paragraph of the "DESCRIPTION" section.


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux annie 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages grep depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.2.5-11.5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 208872-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 01:11:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 10 17:11:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.55])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1ElFjx-0002i4-UD
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 17:11:02 -0800
Received: from andromeda (cpe-69-202-136-66.twcny.res.rr.com [69.202.136.66])
        by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
jBB1AxFe001315
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:10:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 4.60)
        (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
        id 1ElFju-0005v3-MW
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:10:58 -0500
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:10:58 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rgrep.1 fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
From: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

rgrep.1 now mentions rgrep as it should:

$ man rgrep |grep rgrep
Reformatting rgrep(1), please wait...
       grep, egrep, fgrep, rgrep - print lines matching a pattern
       In  addition,  three variant programs egrep, fgrep and rgrep
       rgrep is the same as grep -r.

Therefor I'm closing this bug.

-- 
Clear skies,
Justin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to