Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:31:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2005 07:51:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 16 00:51:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx03.gis.net [208.218.130.11]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DXaOM-0004CF-00; Mon, 16 May 2005 00:51:58 -0700
Received: from arf ([207.7.193.197]) by mx03.gis.net; Mon, 16 May 2005 03:51:55
-0400
Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DXaOa-0006mF-00; Mon, 16 May 2005 03:52:12 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1288178160=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 'man epoll' typos: "clarifiction" and "eventi"
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 03:51:25 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===============1288178160==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: manpages
Version: 2.02-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Found a few typos in '/usr/share/man/man4/epoll.4.gz', see attached '.diff'.
Hope this helps...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
-- no debconf information
--===============1288178160==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="epoll.4.diff"
--- - 2005-05-16 03:51:15.798521000 -0400
+++ /tmp/epoll4.gz.25982 2005-05-16 03:51:15.000000000 -0400
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@
when employed like a Level Triggered interface does have the same
semantics of
.BR poll (2),
-an Edge Triggered usage requires more clarifiction to avoid stalls
+an Edge Triggered usage requires more clarification to avoid stalls
in the application event loop. In this example, listener is a
non-blocking socket on which
.BR listen (2)
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@
then make sure to provide a way to mark its closure dynamically (ie- caused by
a previous event's processing). Suppose you receive 100 events from
.BR epoll_wait (2),
-and in eventi #47 a condition causes event #13 to be closed.
+and in event #47 a condition causes event #13 to be closed.
If you remove the structure and close() the fd for event #13, then your
event cache might still say there are events waiting for that fd causing
confusion.
--===============1288178160==--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 309282-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 09:37:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 12 01:37:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from luonnotar.infodrom.org ([195.124.48.78] ident=postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Elk7I-0005Zg-R8; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:37:09 -0800
Received: by luonnotar.infodrom.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
id ECEE8366B82; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:37:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: at Infodrom Oldenburg (/\##/\ Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2)
from infodrom.org by finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE
via smail from stdin
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:31:46 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:31:46 +0100
From: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: done
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD,
SORTED_RECIPS,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: manpages
Source-Version: 2.05-1
These bugs are all fixed in the abovely mentioned release.
Regards,
Joey
--
If nothing changes, everything will remain the same. -- Barne's Law
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
