Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:31:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2005 08:10:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 16 01:10:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx03.gis.net [208.218.130.11]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DXag2-0002YR-00; Mon, 16 May 2005 01:10:14 -0700
Received: from arf ([207.7.193.197]) by mx03.gis.net; Mon, 16 May 2005 04:10:13
-0400
Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DXagH-0000WO-00; Mon, 16 May 2005 04:10:29 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2069131150=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 'man hosts' typo: "expicitly"
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 04:09:16 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===============2069131150==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: manpages
Version: 2.02-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Found a typo in '/usr/share/man/man5/hosts.equiv.5.gz', see attached '.diff'.
Hope this helps...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
-- no debconf information
--===============2069131150==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="hosts.equiv.5.diff"
--- - 2005-05-16 04:09:09.040473000 -0400
+++ /tmp/hostsequiv.5.gz.1929 2005-05-16 04:09:09.000000000 -0400
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
like-named user accounts on the local host without supplying a password.
The \fIhostname\fP may be (optionally) preceded by a plus (+) sign.
If the plus sign is used alone it allows any host to access your system.
-You can expicitly deny access to a host by preceding the \fIhostname\fP
+You can explicitly deny access to a host by preceding the \fIhostname\fP
by a minus (-) sign. Users from that host must always supply a password.
For security reasons you should always use the FQDN of the hostname and
not the short hostname.
--===============2069131150==--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 309289-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 09:37:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 12 01:37:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from luonnotar.infodrom.org ([195.124.48.78] ident=postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Elk7I-0005Zh-Pi; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:37:09 -0800
Received: by luonnotar.infodrom.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 0BF34366B86; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:37:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: at Infodrom Oldenburg (/\##/\ Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2)
from infodrom.org by finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE
via smail from stdin
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:31:46 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:31:46 +0100
From: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: done
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD,
SORTED_RECIPS,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: manpages
Source-Version: 2.05-1
These bugs are all fixed in the abovely mentioned release.
Regards,
Joey
--
If nothing changes, everything will remain the same. -- Barne's Law
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
