Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 02:32:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311988: fixed in wv2 0.2.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jun 2005 16:32:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 04 09:32:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from farad.aurel32.net [82.232.2.251] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DebZb-0007BU-00; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 09:32:35 -0700
Received: from hertz.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:6439:220:18ff:fe38:7815])
        by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
        (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DebZa-0005sp-BD; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 18:32:34 +0200
Received: from aurel32 by hertz.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DebXz-000KWT-28; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 18:30:55 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: wv2(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: out of date libtool scripts
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 18:30:54 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
        HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wv2
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist


Hello,


The current version of wv2 fails to build on
GNU/kFreeBSD, because of outdated libtool.

The version of libtool in wv2 is too old to correctly 
support Debian GNU/k*BSD.  libtool 1.5.2-1 or later is need.

Here is how to update the libtool in your package (Make sure you
are using libtool 1.5.2-1 or later:
  libtoolize -c -f
  aclocal (-Im4 might be needed if there's an "m4" template dir)
  autoconf

It would also be nice if you can ask upstream to update libtool 
in their next release.


Thanks for your cooperation.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.3-10
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 311988-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 10:41:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 12 02:41:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1ElkyW-0007WC-JC; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 02:32:08 -0800
From: Isaac Clerencia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#311988: fixed in wv2 0.2.2-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 02:32:08 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: wv2
Source-Version: 0.2.2-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
wv2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libwv2-1c2_0.2.2-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/w/wv2/libwv2-1c2_0.2.2-5_i386.deb
libwv2-dev_0.2.2-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/w/wv2/libwv2-dev_0.2.2-5_i386.deb
wv2_0.2.2-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/w/wv2/wv2_0.2.2-5.diff.gz
wv2_0.2.2-5.dsc
  to pool/main/w/wv2/wv2_0.2.2-5.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Isaac Clerencia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated wv2 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 08:36:00 +0100
Source: wv2
Binary: libwv2-1c2 libwv2-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Isaac Clerencia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libwv2-1c2 - a library for accessing Microsoft Word documents
 libwv2-dev - development files for Microsoft Word access library
Closes: 311988 342889
Changes: 
 wv2 (0.2.2-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * wv2-config: introduce a "--static" option to provide options suitable
     for static linking and have "--libs" output just "-lwv2", closes: #342889
   * Update libtool (required to fix FTBFS in GNU/k*BSD), closes: #311988
Files: 
 7582da61b2019114b2cd07300ae3ef73 847 libs optional wv2_0.2.2-5.dsc
 6f4219240fa057119cce493b48abfd77 705795 libs optional wv2_0.2.2-5.diff.gz
 df8798b75567cd22f9a178ce303e3e1d 225752 libs optional 
libwv2-1c2_0.2.2-5_i386.deb
 116c49f87431127f2409a6fbd6e00e1f 183656 libdevel optional 
libwv2-dev_0.2.2-5_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Signed by Isaac Clerencia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

iD8DBQFDnU3uQET2GFTmct4RAlIeAJ44etyFcpzOSiY4T4AxhwD2M36ivQCgmtck
qkffMOmmfsl0pg6xSMSjqDQ=
=iAk3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to