Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:38:35 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342492: digikam: needs rebuild against latest libraries
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2005 23:57:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 07 15:57:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from natnoddy.rzone.de ([81.169.145.166])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Ek99r-000772-A9
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 15:57:11 -0800
Received: from wr.rohdewald.de (p548F94C4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.143.148.196])
        (authenticated bits=0)
        by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jB7Nv8S8026707
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 00:57:08 +0100 (MET)
Received: by wr.rohdewald.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id EDC3DC3404B; Thu,  8 Dec 2005 00:57:07 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Wolfgang Rohdewald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: digikam: needs rebuild against latest libraries
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:57:07 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: digikam
Version: 0.8.0-1-1
Severity: normal

I cannot update KDE because that would uninstall digikam.
digikam should be built against the new *c2a c++ libraries
like kdelibs4c2a

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-abi
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages digikam depends on:
ii  kdelibs4c2               4:3.4.2-4       core libraries for all KDE applica
ii  libart-2.0-2             2.3.17-1        Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libaudio2                1.7-3           The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libc6                    2.3.5-8.1       GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libexif12                0.6.12-2        library to parse EXIF files
ii  libfam0                  2.7.0-8         client library to control the FAM 
ii  libfontconfig1           2.3.2-1.1       generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6             2.1.10-1        FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1                  1:4.0.2-5       GCC support library
ii  libgphoto2-2             2.1.6-5.3       gphoto2 digital camera library
ii  libgphoto2-port0         2.1.6-5.3       gphoto2 digital camera port librar
ii  libice6                  6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libidn11                 0.5.18-1        GNU libidn library, implementation
ii  libimlib2                1.2.1-2         powerful image loading and renderi
ii  libjpeg62                6b-10           The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libkexif1c2              0.2.2-1         library for KDE to read/display/ed
ii  libkipi0c2               0.1.2-1         library for apps that want to use 
ii  libpng12-0               1.2.8rel-5      PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt3-mt                3:3.3.5-3       Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libsm6                   6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Session Management
ii  libsqlite3-0             3.2.7-1         SQLite 3 shared library
ii  libstdc++6               4.0.2-5         The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtiff4                 3.7.4-1         Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii  libx11-6                 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxcursor1              1.1.3-1         X cursor management library
ii  libxext6                 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2                  2.1.7-1         FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxi6                   6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxinerama1             6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System multi-head display
ii  libxrandr2               6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Resize, Rotate and
ii  libxrender1              1:0.9.0-2       X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt6                   6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  xlibs                    6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g                   1:1.2.3-8       compression library - runtime

Versions of packages digikam recommends:
ii  digikamimageplugins           0.8.0-1-1  image editor plugins for digikam a
ii  kdeprint                      4:3.4.2-4  print system for KDE
ii  kipi-plugins                  0.1+rc1-1  image manipulation/handling plugin
ii  konqueror                     4:3.4.2-4  KDE's advanced file manager, web b

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 342492-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 04:38:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 12 20:38:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] 
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Em1vx-0008L7-2j
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:38:37 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 0932F7007; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:38:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:38:35 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#342492: digikam: needs rebuild against latest libraries
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 06:35:01PM +0000, Mark Purcell wrote:
> Steve/ debian-release,

> Could you please reschedule a binNMU for digikam on i386, it seems to bee=
n=20
> missed in the last round.

Scheduled for i386, hppa, and arm.

Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   http://www.debian.org/

--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDnlBLKN6ufymYLloRAgy9AJ9ZKRFAZpC5tQP0qDfrq6o5tTNOXQCdGe6S
jL64w601a/4vax/1zeBLsow=
=DcVO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to