Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:16:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #195772: manpages-dev: socket(7) says SO_RCVTIMEO and
SO_SNDTIMEO are not implemented but they are
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2003 05:12:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 02 00:12:58 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sngrel5.hp.com [192.6.86.210]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19Mhcv-0002JE-00; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 00:12:57 -0500
Received: from XAUBRG2.AUS.HP.COM (xaubrg2.aus.hp.com [15.23.69.43])
by sngrel5.hp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 790A32C3
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 13:12:44 +0800 (SGP)
Received: from 15.23.69.43 by XAUBRG2.AUS.HP.COM (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall
NT); Mon, 02 Jun 2003 15:12:38 +1000
Received: from XAUBRG2.AUS.HP.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by XAUBRG2.AUS.HP.COM
with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59)
id L5HPFH23; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 15:12:38 +1000
Received: from 16.176.65.78 by XAUBRG2.AUS.HP.COM (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall
NT); Mon, 02 Jun 2003 15:12:37 +1000
Received: from mbp by vexed with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19MhcG-0005PN-00; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 15:12:16 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: manpages-dev: socket(7) says SO_RCVTIMEO and SO_SNDTIMEO are not
implemented
but they are
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 15:12:16 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: manpages-dev
Version: 1.48-2
Severity: normal
The socket(7) man page says, regarding the SOL_SOCKET level options:
SO_RCVTIMEO and SO_SNDTIMEO
Specify the sending or receiving timeouts until reporting an
error. They are
fixed to a protocol specific setting in Linux and cannot be read
or written.
Their functionality can be emulated using alarm(2) or
setitimer(2).
In fact, these options do seem to be at least partially implemented in
Linux 2.4.20. You can at least set and retrieve a value against a
socket, and it does seem to affect the (complex) network scheduling
code.
I have not actually tested that they work as advertised, so it might
be good to check with somebody who knows more about it. But the
manpage does seem to be at least partially wrong.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux vexed 2.4.20 #3 Mon Mar 3 12:13:37 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages manpages-dev depends on:
ii manpages 1.48-2 Manual pages about using a GNU/Lin
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 195772-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 14:16:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 06:16:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EmAxE-0001Ce-8p
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:16:32 -0800
Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (popix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
[129.206.119.235])
by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
jBDEHEvj010425
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:17:14 +0100 (MET)
Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
[129.206.100.140])
by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA2039926
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:16:29 +0100
Received: from live (p54A70E77.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.167.14.119])
(authenticated bits=0)
by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
jBDEH7jT026211
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:17:08 +0100
Received: from fernst by live with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1EmAx9-0005v8-6n
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:16:27 +0100
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:16:27 +0100
From: Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: #195772: manpages-dev: socket(7) says SO_RCVTIMEO and SO_SNDTIMEO
are not implemented but they are
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kunpHVz1op/+13PW"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--kunpHVz1op/+13PW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: manpages-dev
Version: 1.67-1
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:51:47 +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Back in May 2004, Andries already added new text to cover=20
> SO_RCVTIME and SO_SNDTIMEO. Why are these bug reports=20
> still open? (Please close them.)
I can confirm this updated text is present as of 1.67 and later, so I
guess this bug can be closed for version 1.67-1.
HTH,
Flo
--kunpHVz1op/+13PW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDnte6s3U+TVFLPnwRAj1jAJ0bqX/p0/wDM8D2oc0G0TUodmeh2wCeJgx2
5xEXqL2R9wHA+7195ylNvmE=
=3Ylm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--kunpHVz1op/+13PW--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
